Magnetism - the proportionality constant question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the magnetic field equation for a long wire, specifically addressing the origin of the 2π factor. The equation is derived from Ampere's Law, which integrates around a circular path of radius r, resulting in the magnetic field (B) being proportional to the current (I) and inversely proportional to the distance (r). The Biot-Savart Law is also referenced, providing a foundational understanding of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ampere's Law
  • Biot-Savart Law
  • Understanding of magnetic fields
  • Basic calculus for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampere's Law in detail
  • Explore the applications of the Biot-Savart Law
  • Learn about magnetic field calculations for different geometries
  • Investigate the role of permeability (μ₀) in magnetic field equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electromagnetism and the principles governing magnetic fields.

dragon513
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
cb89c25072088f55cddf1b60ce6bd8a9.png


Hi! Can anyone please tell me where this equation was derived from?
This equation is used to get the magnetic field (B).
I is current and r is the distance. And I think I understand the Meu. And yet I have no idea where the 2pi came from. I looked in my textbook, internet and asked friends but nobody seems to know.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the magnitude of the magnetic field carried by a long wire. I think you meant r instead of y in the equation you displayed. You obtain it by simple application of Ampere's Law and the 2\pi r comes from integrating around a circle of radius r (i.e. it's the circumference of the circle).
 
Well, that's the magnetic field from an infinite straight wire, which you can get using Biot-Savart:

d\vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I \vec{dl} \times \hat{r}}{r^2}

Biot-Savart is derived from Ampere's Law:

\int_C \vec{B} \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu_0 \int_S \vec{J} \cdot \vec{da}
 
aha, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
709
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K