Magnetization of Permanent Spherical Magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the magnetization of spherical permanent magnets and how their effective magnetization changes when multiple magnets are combined. When four spherical magnets are attached, their magnetic moments can add, but the effective magnetization depends on their configuration and distance from each other. The force exerted by the magnets on an iron plate varies significantly based on their arrangement; if all four are touching the plate, the force is quadrupled, but if only one is in contact, the increase in force is minimal. There is a request for references to support claims about solenoid magnetic fields, indicating a need for further research on this topic. Overall, the interaction between the magnets and the iron plate is influenced by their positioning and proximity.
Michael Lin
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

1) For a spherical permanent magnet, the magnetization M is defined to be pi/4u0*Br*d^3. My question is: if I attach 4 such spherical magnets together, would the magnetization simply be 4M? Where (website) can I find a good reference for these type of material?

2) I have read in an article, "Magnet levitation at your fingertips" (please google) that for a setup with a solenoid creating a magnetic field, B that B/B' can be approximated by R (for short solenoid) and 1.2 R (for long solenoid). However, I can not find any articles or books that support this claim. How did the author came up with that?

Thanks,
Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetization M is usually defined as the magnetic moment per unit volume.
Your formula gives the magnetilc moment, usually designated by m or mu.
The magnetic moments of 4 such magnets would tend to add, but the effective power would be determined by the configuration. They could not be brought close enough to give 4m effectively, since the field falls off quickly with distance.
 
Thanks for your response to (1).
Is there any way I can calculate the effective M? I can properly simulate or measure the field around 4 such vertically attached magnets and derive M from that. Do you have any good reference that I can look up?
 
The force between a spherical magnet of radius R with magnetic moment m and a touching iron plate will equal the force between magnetic dipoles a distance 2R apart. This F=6m^2/(2R)^4 dynes (if m is in gauss).
If you use four such spheres, all touching the iron plate, the force will be 4 times as large.
 
Thanks for your response.
Your explanation is very clear. My concern is, however, if the iron plate is touching only one of the four spherical magnets oriented vertically, will the effective force on the iron plate still be 4 times?
 
If you put the magnets like this OO
OO, with all four touching the plate,
the force will be four times that of one magnet.
If you line them up like OOOO, with the plate touching only one, it will be only slightly stronger than one magnet.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top