Magnets lines of force are electrons?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of magnetic fields and the concept of lines of force associated with magnets. Participants explore the relationship between electrons, ions, and the visual representation of magnetic fields, delving into both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the lines of force in a magnetic field can be equated to electrons, suggesting that they are more accurately represented as photons that mediate electromagnetic forces.
  • One participant explains that electricity involves electrons moving relative to ions, and this motion leads to the creation of a magnetic field, which they describe as a relativistic correction to the electrostatic field.
  • Another participant emphasizes that lines of force are not physical entities but rather a visual representation of the magnetic field, which can be illustrated through experiments with iron filings or compasses.
  • Some participants express confusion about the movement of ions and electrons in solid materials, indicating a need for further clarification on the concepts of relative motion and magnetic fields.
  • A participant mentions the intrinsic spin of electrons as a factor in the behavior of permanent magnets, contrasting this with a more simplistic view of "holes" between electrons.
  • There is a suggestion that the lines of force are merely a useful conceptual tool rather than a definitive description of the magnetic field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of lines of force or their relationship to electrons and photons. Multiple competing views remain, with some arguing for a more abstract representation of magnetic fields while others focus on the physical interactions of charged particles.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concepts of magnetic fields and the role of charged particles, indicating potential limitations in their grasp of the underlying physics. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and assumptions about the nature of magnetic forces.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the fundamentals of electromagnetism, particularly those curious about the conceptual frameworks used to understand magnetic fields and forces.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Magnets "lines of force are" electrons?

So I understand that a magnetic field is defined by the lines of force that go from the north to the south pole...what are these forces? The flow of electrons back and forth...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Electricity is electrons moving relative to their ions (the protons in the conductor). Let's just say there is a positive charge nearby within the electric field, it will tend to follow the motion of the electrons.

Now from the reference frame of the external positive charge, the electrons are not moving, but rather the ions are moving. So the ions have more relativistic mass over the electrons and a positive electrostatic force becomes present to the moving positive charge. This charge will then be pushed away from the current.

This is what we measure as the magnetic field. It is a relativistic correction to the electrostatic field.
 


Hmm, I guess it's somewhat hard to grasp that "ions are moving" in a solid matter...I'm going to have to think about it more.
 


In response to the OP's original question, the lines of force for a magnet are NOT electrons. If anything they would be photons that carry the electromagnetic force, but a better way to look at it is that the lines of force are simply a visual way of representing the magnetic field of a magnet. In reality you would have effectively "infinite" lines of force.
 


A long long time ago, lines of force were explained to me as the paths that a 'free North Pole" would take on its journey to from the North to the South pole of a magnet. They aren't really there but they are a useful picture to hold in the mind. The field is strong where the lines are close together and weak where they are far apart.
This by no means a complete description of a field but it may help.
 


Drakkith said:
In response to the OP's original question, the lines of force for a magnet are NOT electrons. If anything they would be photons that carry the electromagnetic force, but a better way to look at it is that the lines of force are simply a visual way of representing the magnetic field of a magnet. In reality you would have effectively "infinite" lines of force.


I see. So in other words, "scientists aren't sure what they are, but if it helps you understand, think they're photons!"

I dig that :)
 


Femme_physics said:
I see. So in other words, "scientists aren't sure what they are, but if it helps you understand, think they're photons!"

I dig that :)

Good grief. There aren't any lines. They are cartoon drawings. See what sophiecentaur had to say in the previous post.
 


It may just be easier to understand that the electric field describes the force between charged particles. The magnetic field relates an additional force that occurs between charged particles when they are in relative motion. These force fields are vector fields. This means that at every point in space the force field is describe by a magnitude and direction. These force line drawings are a way of visualizing this vector field in an easily comprehensive manner. Because of the way that many objects will align along the direction of an applied magnetic force, the visualization of the field lines can be created physically using iron filings or compasses.
 
  • #10


The way I understood a magnet was that the way all of the holes in between the electrons faced one way while the electrons faced another way creating the repelling and attracting forces. Since protons attract each other the holes allowed the protons to interact more then they usually would in other material.
 
  • #11


I should do a bit of Googling to sort out your knowledge, Kainchild.
You seem to have a rather 'alternative' view of it. :-)
 
  • #12


Kainchild said:
The way I understood a magnet was that the way all of the holes in between the electrons faced one way while the electrons faced another way creating the repelling and attracting forces. Since protons attract each other the holes allowed the protons to interact more then they usually would in other material.

You are thinking of a natural magnet. A rock that has magnetic properties. Rather than holes it is usually referred to as intrinsic spin of the electrons.
sophiecentaur said:
Or any permanent magnet, in fact.

Yea, that is the word I was looking for.
 
Last edited:
  • #13


Or any permanent magnet, in fact.
 
  • #14


Femme_physics said:
I see. So in other words, "scientists aren't sure what they are, but if it helps you understand, think they're photons!"

I dig that :)

Lol, that's not what I meant. The field lines are only a visual way for us to REPRESENT the field or force or whatever you want to call it. And photons are the mediator of the electromagnetic force, so if we are talking about what particles mediate the forces then it would be the photon in this case, not an electron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K