thebiggerbang
- 75
- 0
Why is it that we prefer to use magnifying power instead of magnification for optical instruments like microscopes and telescopes?
The discussion explores the distinction between "magnifying power" and "magnification" in the context of optical instruments such as microscopes and telescopes. It addresses the grammatical and conceptual implications of these terms, as well as their definitions and applications in optics.
Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of magnification versus magnifying power, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.
Some statements rely on specific definitions and contexts, such as the conditions under which magnification is considered infinite or the dependence on angular measurements, which may not be universally accepted.
Magnification is the process of enlarging something only in appearance, not in physical size. This enlargement is quantified by a calculated number also called "magnification". When this number is less than one it refers to a reduction in size, sometimes called "minification" or "de-magnification".
The magnification of a magnifying glass depends upon where it is placed between the user's eye and the object being viewed, and the total distance between them. The magnifying power is equivalent to angular magnification (this should not be confused with optical power, which is a different quantity) The magnifying power is the ratio of the sizes of the images formed on the user's retina with and without the lens