Magnitude 5.7 Earthquake - Christchurch, New Zealand

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the magnitude 5.7 earthquake that struck near Christchurch, New Zealand, on February 14, 2016. Participants share information about the earthquake's impact, including damage reports, aftershocks, and the potential for future seismic activity. The conversation includes various perspectives on the earthquake's significance and the geological context of the region.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants report on the immediate effects of the earthquake, including power outages and damage to buildings like the ChristChurch Cathedral.
  • There are conflicting reports regarding the depth of the earthquake, with some sources stating 8.2 km and others reporting 15 km.
  • Participants note the historical context of seismic activity in Christchurch, mentioning a period of relative quiet from 2013 to 2015.
  • One participant mentions a new model indicating a 63% chance of another earthquake in the Canterbury region within the next 12 months, up from 49% prior to the recent quake.
  • There is discussion about the geological activity in the region, with references to other recent earthquakes and aftershocks, including a 4.3 magnitude aftershock that occurred shortly after the main event.
  • Some participants express skepticism about comments made by officials regarding the predictability of earthquakes in active regions.
  • There are mentions of various seismic monitoring websites and their differing data on earthquake parameters.
  • Participants share personal experiences of feeling the earthquake and discuss the implications for building safety in Christchurch.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the implications of the earthquake or the accuracy of reported data. There is acknowledgment of uncertainty regarding future seismic activity and differing interpretations of official statements.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the limitations of current earthquake prediction models and the variability in reported seismic data from different sources. The conversation reflects ongoing concerns about the geological stability of the region.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following seismic activity in New Zealand, including researchers, residents of Christchurch, and individuals concerned with earthquake preparedness and safety.

Earth sciences news on Phys.org
When you need a news channel ... they are busy celebrating Scalia ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MrsSir
Astronuc said:
http://www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/

I was following the quakes around Christchurch since 2010, and it seems things were quieting down during 2013-2015.

USGS - http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20005019#general_region
Date/time 2016-02-14 00:13:43 (UTC)
Lat 43.503 °S, Long 172.843 °E
Depth=8.2 km (5.1 mi)

Yes it's been a while since we had anything significant so yesterday's series was quite a surprise. Fortunately no injuries and no serious damage, all schools and the University are open today.

Cheers
 
cosmik debris said:
Yes it's been a while since we had anything significant so yesterday's series was quite a surprise. Fortunately no injuries and no serious damage, all schools and the University are open today.

Cheers
Minister Brownlee says yesterday's earthquake was expected, but of course no one can predict when they will hit. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...nister-Gerry-Brownlee-says-shake-was-expected
 
Yup, M 5.8 (USGS) (5.7 GNS) is a significant event, specially so close to a large populated area
where building ( those left standing from the earlier events) have already been stressed

my daughter, living on the south side of central Christchurch, said it was the strongest she had felt since the 2011 events ... It was a "get into doorway " sized shake, she told merecorded it well on my seismo ...

zhi.gif
will still be visible for a few more hours ( ~ 7 - 8)Dave
 
  • #10
StevieTNZ said:
Minister Brownlee says yesterday's earthquake was expected, but of course no one can predict when they will hit. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...nister-Gerry-Brownlee-says-shake-was-expected

a bit of a silly comment by him ... as that applies to any active region in NZ
Significant events are "expected " from all the active fault zones and that encompasses some ~ 70% of the NZ regionDave
 
  • #11
There is a high possibility Christchurch could be hit with another earthquake in the next 12 months following Sunday's 5.7 magnitude quake.

According to new modelling completed by GNS Science, there is a 63 per cent chance of another 5 to 5.9 earthquake in the Canterbury region.

Before Sunday's quake the figure was 49 per cent.

https://nz.news.yahoo.com/top-stories/a/30819309/high-chance-of-another-strong-christchurch-earthquake/
 
  • #14
Not related to Christchurch, but this earthquake was felt by some in Christchurch before -- https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/30830261/severe-earthquake-south-of-new-zealand/

"It hit at 10km depth at 8:28am and a number of felt reports have been logged since then in Invercargill, Dunedin and as far north as Christchurch." Magnitude 6.0.

I am sure today in Parliament a statement will be made about the Christchurch earthquake.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #15
StevieTNZ said:
Not related to Christchurch, but this earthquake was felt by some in Christchurch before -- https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/30830261/severe-earthquake-south-of-new-zealand/

"It hit at 10km depth at 8:28am and a number of felt reports have been logged since then in Invercargill, Dunedin and as far north as Christchurch." Magnitude 6.0.

I am sure today in Parliament a statement will be made about the Christchurch earthquake.

yeah another decent one ... .I saw it starting to arrive on my seismo 30 mins before I left home for work
2 events on the seismo currently, 5.9 Tonga and the M 6.2 Auckland Isl reg. South of the South Island of NZ

zhi.gif
EDIT ... meant to also comment ... This event has produced one of the larger T-Wave signals I have so far recorded. very obvious on the geophone E-W channel @ 19:48 - 19:50 UT

syde.gif
Dave
 
  • #16
http://www.inthehouse.co.nz/video/41507

Questions about the Christchurch earthquakes posed to the Minister for Building and Housing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
  • #23
StevieTNZ said:
I am guessing that is the Mt Cook earthquake from today: https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/30876689/earthquake-hits-mt-cook/

No it was the M 4.3 aftershock a couple of km's NW of the M5.8 :smile:

The Mt Cook event is on a different fault, far away
StevieTNZ said:
I'll be down in Christchurch 11-13 March. Hope no earthquakes occur while I am there!

have fun, a high probability that you may feel several smaller events, there's still many of them occurring each day

Dave
 
  • #24
Felt this one, near Seddon, earlier: https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/30884931/severe-earthquake-strikes-near-seddon/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #25
StevieTNZ said:
Felt this one, near Seddon, earlier: https://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/30884931/severe-earthquake-strikes-near-seddon/

only just recorded that one on my seismo here in SydneyD
 
  • #26
And it seems there was another strong earthquake down in Christchurch early this morning:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/ne...e-quake-wakes-sleeping-christchurch-residents

Christchurch residents have described hearing a roar before an early morning quake on Monday "hit like a freight train", shaking them from their beds.

The 4.3 magnitude earthquake hit near Cashmere, just five kilometres south of the central city, at 3.32am.

It hit at a depth of just five kilometres. Geonet listed the quake as "strong".

Eeeckk, and I am down in Christchurch 11 - 13 March.
 
  • #27
M 4.3 - 14km (9 mi) ESE of Christchurch, New Zealand (moderate) USGS puts it under Godley Head Farm Park, near the location where the cliffs collapsed, but the Canterbury Quake site puts it 5 km under Christchurch north of Cashmere Rd. That's quite a difference.

Time: 2016-02-28 14:32:40 UTC
Location: Lat 43.584°S, Long 172.803°E
Depth: 10.0 km - Shallow

It would definitely feel strong if one was close to the epicenter.

29 Feb 2016 3:32am Depth 5.00 km Mag 4.30
http://www.canterburyquakelive.co.nz/Browse/?reference=quake.2016p158394
 
  • #28
  • #29
Astronuc said:
M 4.3 - 14km (9 mi) ESE of Christchurch, New Zealand (moderate) USGS puts it under Godley Head Farm Park, near the location where the cliffs collapsed, but the Canterbury Quake site puts it 5 km under Christchurch north of Cashmere Rd. That's quite a difference.

which is why I don't rely on the USGS when it comes to event locations well outside their high density networks
and that goes for any event outside the USA ... mainland USA, Hawaii and Alaska have great high density networks and have no problems accurately locating events within those regions
For the rest of the world, the need to rely on networks within the countries concerned is important

the USGS/NEIC have one station within NZ, in Wellington as part of its WWSSN the next closest ones are more than 1000km away

Dave
 
Last edited:
  • #30
cosmik debris said:
That one was quite a jolt, seeing as it was under the city and only 5kM down, the accelerations were quite high for a seemingly low magnitude. Woke me and the cat up, it was short though so I didn't make it out of bed.

yes, my daughter in Riccarton felt it quite well too ( within 10km of the epicentre)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K