Magnitude 5.7 Earthquake - Christchurch, New Zealand

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the magnitude 5.7 earthquake that struck near Christchurch, New Zealand, on February 14, 2016. Participants share information about the earthquake's impact, including damage reports, aftershocks, and the potential for future seismic activity. The conversation includes various perspectives on the earthquake's significance and the geological context of the region.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants report on the immediate effects of the earthquake, including power outages and damage to buildings like the ChristChurch Cathedral.
  • There are conflicting reports regarding the depth of the earthquake, with some sources stating 8.2 km and others reporting 15 km.
  • Participants note the historical context of seismic activity in Christchurch, mentioning a period of relative quiet from 2013 to 2015.
  • One participant mentions a new model indicating a 63% chance of another earthquake in the Canterbury region within the next 12 months, up from 49% prior to the recent quake.
  • There is discussion about the geological activity in the region, with references to other recent earthquakes and aftershocks, including a 4.3 magnitude aftershock that occurred shortly after the main event.
  • Some participants express skepticism about comments made by officials regarding the predictability of earthquakes in active regions.
  • There are mentions of various seismic monitoring websites and their differing data on earthquake parameters.
  • Participants share personal experiences of feeling the earthquake and discuss the implications for building safety in Christchurch.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the implications of the earthquake or the accuracy of reported data. There is acknowledgment of uncertainty regarding future seismic activity and differing interpretations of official statements.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the limitations of current earthquake prediction models and the variability in reported seismic data from different sources. The conversation reflects ongoing concerns about the geological stability of the region.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following seismic activity in New Zealand, including researchers, residents of Christchurch, and individuals concerned with earthquake preparedness and safety.

  • #31
davenn said:
the USGS/NEIC have one station within NZ, in Wellington as part of its WWSN the next closest ones are more than 1000km away
It would seem they need an array in Canterbury. NZ seems to have a good network there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #32
Astronuc said:
It would seem they need an array in Canterbury. NZ seems to have a good network there.

you may already be aware of this ??
...
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/monitoring/gsn/

that gives the locations and operational status for the GSN, Global Seismic Network, formerly the WWSSN (World Wide Standard Seismic Network)

Once upon a time they were all running the Sprengnether long period horizontal seismometer
http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_1445876

Sprengnether horizontal long period seismometer.jpg


I ran one from home for most of the 1990's, it was a spare from the Otago University Geology Dept
where I did my geol. studies

They were a solid beast weighing around 80 lbs .. triangular shaped base about 1.5 ft per side
around 40lbs of the weight was in that central vertical cylinder of brass. the whole thing had a cover
over it with a little window to observe the arm centring pointer that you can see in the centre of the brass mass ... a really nice instrument

here's a link to many of the seismograms of the stations around the world
They update roughly every 30 mins

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/monitoring/operations/heliplots_gsn.php Dave

PS ... you may well be coming to realize over recent years, that this subject is a real hobby horse of mine :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K