Magnitude and Direction of Electric Field at the origin? Please help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the origin due to a continuous line of charge along the x-axis, extending from a point x = +x0 to positive infinity, with a uniform linear charge density lambda.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the placement of the line of charge and its implications for the electric field at the origin. There is uncertainty about whether the line starts at the origin or at x0, leading to questions about the necessity of using a cylindrical Gaussian surface. Some participants suggest integrating to find the electric field, while others express confusion about the integration process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. Some guidance has been offered regarding integration, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the placement of x0 and question whether it could be at the origin or far from it. The problem constraints and the requirement for integration are also under discussion.

SilverGirl
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A continuous line of charge lies along the x axis, extending from x=+xo to positive infinity. The line carries charge with a uniform linear charge density lambda. What are the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the origin?


Homework Equations


E = lambda/2pieor for the magnitude of electric field produced by a uniformly charged infinite line.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn a cylindrical Gaussian Surface around it. By the wording of the question, I am not sure where the line of charge is placed (does it start at the origin?). I have placed the line at the origin, with the cylinder starting at the origin. I have concluded (not sure if it is correct) that the field on the end of the cylinder is equal to zero, because the field can only pass through the center of the circle.

Am I close at all to the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SilverGirl said:
A continuous line of charge lies along the x axis, extending from x=+xo to positive infinity. The line carries charge with a uniform linear charge density lambda. What are the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the origin?

I have drawn a cylindrical Gaussian Surface around it. By the wording of the question, I am not sure where the line of charge is placed (does it start at the origin?) …

Hi SilverGirl! :smile:

(have a pi: π and an epsilon: ε and a lambda: λ and an infinity: ∞ :smile:)

No, the line starts at x0 and goes to +∞.

hmm … no idea what you mean by a cylindrical Gaussian Surface. :confused:

Hint: slice the line into bits of length dx, and integrate from x0 to +∞. :smile:
 
Is xo at any particular place on the x-axis though? Maybe I didn't have to use the cylinder.
 
SilverGirl said:
Is xo at any particular place on the x-axis though? Maybe I didn't have to use the cylinder.

erm … it's at x0 ! :confused:

isn't that particular enough for you? :wink:
 
Not really..lol..because couldn't x0 be at the origin? Also, couldn't it be very very far away from the origin? Do you know of a way to do this without integrating?
 
SilverGirl said:
Not really..lol..because couldn't x0 be at the origin?

No, because the question says "+x0", and 0 isn't + :smile:
Do you know of a way to do this without integrating?

Nope! :biggrin:
 
lol..good point.

I am guessing the field is not 0 at the origin, even though the line of charge is not there.
 
Yes, you're right. It's not zero at the origin. It would be zero if the line extended from -\infty to \infty. Now tiny-tim's hint was to integrate it. You need to start with dE = \frac{dq}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 r(x)^2}, where r(x) is function of x which tells you the distance from any point on the line of charge to the origin.

You still need to express dq in some other way so that the integration can be done.

By symmetry, you should be able to determine what the E-field direction at O should be.
 
I've been using this problem for reference but I am so lost...I'm doing the same exact thing.

I am having trouble integrating. Could someone please walk me through it step by step with this equation?
 
  • #10
Doc Z said:
I've been using this problem for reference but I am so lost...I'm doing the same exact thing.

I am having trouble integrating. Could someone please walk me through it step by step with this equation?

Hi Doc Z! :smile:

Show us how far you've got with the equation (and which equation? :confused:), and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :smile:
 
  • #11
I'm using E=2ke * lambda/r

I pretty much don't even know how to start integrating this.
 
  • #12
Doc Z said:
I'm using E=2ke * lambda/r

I pretty much don't even know how to start integrating this.

Hint: slice the line into bits of length dx, and integrate from x0 to +∞.

What do you get? :smile:
 
  • #13
I found the answer to be ke * lambda/x0 in the -i direction but I don't understand how to get it. I don't remember integrals too well.
 
  • #14
Doc Z said:
I found the answer to be ke * lambda/x0 in the -i direction but I don't understand how to get it. I don't remember integrals too well.

You know that E = k*Q/r2 for a point charge.

So the field at the origin from any point over the range of charges is given by

E(r) = k*Q/r2

But Q by the problem statement is

ΔQ = λ * Δr

Rewriting the equation:

E(r) = k * λ * Δr/r2

Consequently then to sum up all the charge elements from r = xo to r = ∞ you take the definite integral.

E_{(r)} = \int_{x_0}^{\infty} \frac{k * \lambda * dr}{r^2}
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K