Magnitude and Direction of Electric Field - Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnitude and direction of the electric field, specifically involving concepts of charge density and integration in the context of electric fields generated by charged objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for integration to calculate contributions from infinitesimal charges and explore the formula for electric field strength. Questions arise about the correct setup for integration and the determination of charge density.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing various approaches to setting up the calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of integration and the need to consider components of the electric field, but there is no explicit consensus on the method or final approach.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of formulas and the determination of angles for integration, with some participants expressing uncertainty about textbook examples and the setup of the problem.

UNG
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I also have another question that I am very confused about

Here it is
4ques-1.jpg


I think you are suppose to find the magnitude and direction of the electric field and the formula needed is,

E = 1 / (4x 3.14 x e0) x (density x distance / R^2)

And I was told integration is needed too??

but I really don't know where to start, a correct formula to show the steps would be helpful.

Many thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes integration will be required. First you will have to find the linear charge density of the lines of charge. This is fairly simple to do. Integration will be needed as you will have to sum the contributions of the infinitesimal charges of the ring. Have you seen any examples in any textbooks?
 
Um no I don really understand the examples in the textbooks.
 
Ok. Well how would you determine the arc length of a circle?
 
With the formula,

L = angle x 3.14 x R / 180
 
Get the net x-component of the field due to the negative segment... get the net y-component of the field due to the negative segment...

then do the same thing for the positive component.

only plug in the numbers at the end...

If theta is the angle as measured from the negative y-axis going clockwise... an infintesimal charge is [tex]dq = Rd\theta*\sigma[/tex] where [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the charge density. what is sigma in terms of q? what is the x-component of this field? what is the y-component of this field?
 
Could I also find the x -component from the formula,

[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \int \frac{\lambda(\vec{r}^{\prime}) ds^{\prime}}{R^2}[/tex]
 
UNG said:
Could I also find the x -component from the formula,

[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \int \frac{\lambda(\vec{r}^{\prime}) ds^{\prime}}{R^2}[/tex]

I don't think that would work exactly as it is... to get the x-component... you need to add up the x-components of each infinitesimal charge.

this would be better:

[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \int \frac{\lambda(\vec{r}^{\prime}) ds^{\prime}}{R^2}cos(\theta)[/tex]
 
But there is no angle given to calculate it?
 
  • #10
UNG said:
But there is no angle given to calculate it?

The angle changes as you integrate... you set up the angle yourself to integrate...
 
  • #11
okay so that means you could choose your angle,

for instance 180 degrees and put it in the formula
 
  • #12
No. suppose theta is the angle from the negative y-axis going clockwise... the charge density is sigma q/(0.25*2pi*r) = 2q/pi*r

an differential element has charge [tex]\sigma*ds = \sigma*rd\theta[/tex]

The magnitude of the field due to this charge is [tex]\frac{k\sigma*ds}{r^2}[/tex]. The x-component of this field is:

[tex]-\frac{k\sigma*ds}{r^2}sin(\theta)}[/tex]

which equals

[tex]-\frac{k\sigma*rd\theta}{r^2}sin(\theta)[/tex]...

which is

[tex]-\frac{k(2q/\pi r)*rd\theta}{r^2}sin(\theta)[/tex]...

which is:

[tex]\frac{-2kqd\theta}{\pi r^2}sin(\theta)[/tex]...


if you integrate this from theta equals 0 to pi/2... you get the x-component due to the -q part...

the y-component is [tex]-\frac{k\sigma*ds}{r^2}cos(\theta)}[/tex]

integrate this from 0 to pi/2 and you get the y-component due to the -q part...

do the same type of thing with the +q part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K