Magnitude of abs(H(exp(jwT)) = 2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the magnitude of the function H(exp(jwT)) and the participants' understanding of complex exponentials, particularly in relation to Euler's identity and the properties of absolute values in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the magnitude of H(exp(jwT)) equals 2, expressing difficulty in deriving this using real and imaginary parts.
  • Another participant asserts that the magnitudes of the exponentials are 1, leading to a simplified calculation of (1+2)/1.5 = 2.
  • A participant questions the understanding of Euler's identity and suggests that the magnitude should be derived from the square root of the sum of squared real and imaginary parts.
  • One contributor emphasizes the importance of understanding the proof that the magnitude of the complex exponential is 1, referencing the identity sin² + cos² = 1.
  • Another participant provides a detailed mathematical breakdown of the absolute value of H(z) using the definitions of x and y in terms of cosine and sine.
  • There is a repeated expression of confusion regarding Euler's identity and its application to finding absolute values of exponentials.
  • A later reply critiques the expectation of understanding complex mathematics without foundational knowledge, suggesting a need for more familiarity with the concepts.
  • One participant lightens the discussion with a humorous remark about the significance of Euler's identity in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding Euler's identity and the calculation of magnitudes, with some agreeing on the basic properties of complex exponentials while others remain confused or skeptical about the explanations provided. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach to calculating the magnitude.

Contextual Notes

Some participants rely on specific definitions and properties of complex numbers, while others express uncertainty about applying these concepts. There is a lack of consensus on the interpretation of Euler's identity and its relevance to the problem at hand.

Butters
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
abs(H(exp(jwT))=abs((exp(jwT)+2)/(exp(jwT)+0.5))=2

How come the answer is 2. I just find it impossible to express it in terms of Imaginary and Real parts so that I could find the absolute value.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks but I didn't get what you mean by Euler's identity. I know that one can express exponential in terms of real (coswT) and imaginary (jsinwT) parts. Then the magnitude should be squared root of the sum of those parts squared.
Anyway, so whenever I have to find absolute value of exponentials I just substitute 1. Is it the same for exp(-2jwT) and exp(-jwT)?
 
You need to understand such that you can prove the magnitude is 1. It is actually very simple. sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 by definition.

On the complex plane the comnplex exponential represents the magnitude and angle of a vector. If you draw that and the right triangle it defines, you see the cos part (horizontal axis) and the sin part (vert axis). It is that simple. If the exponential has an amplitude (like Aexp(-jwt)) then you modify the vector and adjust accordingly. (now it is Asin + Acos)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Euler's_formula.svg
 
Abs(x+jy)=sqrt(x^2+y^2) see: http://www.clarku.edu/~djoyce/complex/abs.html
Let's say exp(jwt)=z=x+jy x=cos(wt) y=sin(wt) x^2+y^2=1
Abs(H(z))=Abs(x+2+jy)/Abs(x+0.5+jy)=sqrt(((x+2)^2+y^2)/((x+0.5)^2+y^2)))
x^2+4x+4+y^2=4x+5
x^2+x+0.25+y^2=x+1.25
sqrt((4x+5)/(x+1.25))=2 for all x!
 
Butters said:
Thanks but I didn't get what you mean by Euler's identity. I know that one can express exponential in terms of real (coswT) and imaginary (jsinwT) parts. Then the magnitude should be squared root of the sum of those parts squared.
Anyway, so whenever I have to find absolute value of exponentials I just substitute 1. Is it the same for exp(-2jwT) and exp(-jwT)?

The idea on a forum like this is that you come across a term like "Euler's Identity" and you look it up. If the maths is beyond you the, perhaps you need to get more familiar with it. I learned Euler's Identity at A level so it isn't that hard to understand - even less difficult to find it somewhere on the web. Maths is not a field where you can dip into it at random places and expect to 'get it'. You need to start at your present level and follow it through.
I am not being grumpy about this; I am simply being realistic.
 
You are right, Sophiecentaur, it is not a big deal and I am doubt if Leonard Euler himself dealt with it, indeed.Of course, it is not Gamma or Bessel function but was as a joke for a smile.:approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K