Making a reliable potentiometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter kolleamm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentiometer
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
kolleamm
Messages
476
Reaction score
44
Long story short : I need a good solid semiconductor material besides pencil lead

I can't find any potentiometers that I can insert my own shaft into so I decided to try to make my own. The shaft is about 0.25" in diameter so it's not something big.

Anyways, I know I can use pencil lead as a semiconductor to make a potentiometer but I get the feeling the device will eventually wipe off the material. I need a good solid semiconductor, maybe something I can cut with scissors?

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kolleamm said:
Long story short : I need a good solid semiconductor material besides pencil lead

I can't find any potentiometers that I can insert my own shaft into so I decided to try to make my own. The shaft is about 0.25" in diameter so it's not something big.

Anyways, I know I can use pencil lead as a semiconductor to make a potentiometer but I get the feeling the device will eventually wipe off the material. I need a good solid semiconductor, maybe something I can cut with scissors?

Thanks in advance.
Making your own potentiometer material and wiper material seems problematic. Can you say more about why you can't just use some standard potentiometer and adapt it to your application?

BTW, I'm attaching a very helpful tutorial on potentiometers from Bourns FYI... :smile:
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and kolleamm
Pencil lead is not a semiconductor.
It's graphite (carbon), which is a normal conductor, but not a very good conductor.
I don't know if there are substances with similar properties but more hard wearing, but a lot of commercially made variable resistors do use carbon.
(and yes wearing down of the carbon track is often a mode of their failure)
 
It will be used on the shoulder of a robotic arm to determine it's position. It needs to be mounted on the outside of the arm, which has a small shaft coincidentally to keep the joint on the axis.

I looked online for potentiometers but...they are ridiculously bulky and have an unnecessary shaft of their own.

Here is a rough sketch, please excuse the quick drawing work :D The red part is where I would like the potentiometer to be.
 

Attachments

  • arm p.png
    arm p.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 538
Have you considered using rotary encoders? That would be more reliable than even commercial pots, and I believe that this is how such robot position sensors usually are done...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook, davenn, Nidum and 1 other person
berkeman said:
Have you considered using rotary encoders? That would be more reliable than even commercial pots, and I believe that this is how such robot position sensors usually are done...
I've heard of them but never considered them, I'll check them out, thanks!
 
Yes - encoder is a far better solution .

If you must use potentiometers then get some ordinary ones and use the resistance tracks and wipers from them in your own assembly . Old style radio ones are best sources of bits .
 
The only problem I'm seeing though with the encoder is that they would probably consume more power since they require an additional chip. Price is also a factor, and I would need to build a more complex code to handle the number of clicks to determine the position. I don't mind paying more, but over time things do break and having to replace encoders might be more of a headache than a potentiometer.
 
kolleamm said:
The only problem I'm seeing though with the encoder is that they would probably consume more power since they require an additional chip. Price is also a factor, and I would need to build a more complex code to handle the number of clicks to determine the position. I don't mind paying more, but over time things do break and having to replace encoders might be more of a headache than a potentiometer.

a rotary encoder will last a lifetime compared to a "pot"
you would be very wise to take the suggestion offered by Berkeman. It is the usual way for position determinationDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kolleamm
If your Robot is going to be in any way autonomous, you are going to need an ADC to convert the output of a home made potentiometer. Why not cut out the middle man and start with a digital position encoder? Fit and forget. These things are modern and very reliable. There is a good reason why they don't use analogue pots on control knobs these days.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook
They do have potentiometers in them however they don't report back their position to the controller for some reason. I guess it's just how they're built for simplicity.

Okay I will take your guys advice and try out some encoders instead.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum and berkeman