Making the Transition from Basic to Advanced Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter someperson05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a college freshman majoring in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science who is struggling to transition from basic to advanced mathematics despite excelling in classes. The individual is actively engaging in additional projects and seminars but feels stuck when attempting to learn independently, particularly in areas like set theory and proofs. Responses emphasize the importance of time and patience in the learning process, suggesting that understanding will develop as the individual continues to practice and absorb concepts. Recommendations include focusing on exercises and allowing ideas to mature subconsciously rather than seeking immediate mastery. Overall, persistence and time are highlighted as key factors in achieving deeper mathematical understanding.
someperson05
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Making the "Transition"

Hello. I am currently a freshman in college, finishing up my second semester. I am looking at basically majoring in mathematics. (My actual major title will be Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, I am creating a major plan to better suit my needs.) Regardless of that though, I will always be a mathematician at heart.

Let me get to the point. I have been trying my hardest beyond class to study as much mathematics as possible. I've been doing a mini project, taking an extra problem solving seminar class, reading extra books, etc. etc. No matter what I do however, no matter how much I feel like my mathematics skills progress, I can't seem to make the leap into "advanced mathematics." I feel somewhat like Zeno's Paradox, getting ever closer to a higher level of mathematical ability but never actually getting there.

I am acing my multi-variable calculus class, and I will continue to ace all of my classes, I am confident of that. They are easy, just doing the problems seems so simple. I always do well when there is a teacher to explain the concepts. Its when I attempt to learn things on my own, like set theory, proofs, that I can only ever pull out fragments from the text and then feel stuck, left to find another book or ask a teacher. I feel like a true mathematician must eventually be able to deduce things on their own, lest they be left to do little original research.

So my question is, can anyone make any recommendations on how to achieve this transition beyond simply reading more? I will continue to read and try, but if there is anything that someone has found that has helped them to make this "transition", I would love to know. I am willing to devote any hours of effort and work, which is what it probably amounts to anyway. Is there a textbook or just a book in general that helped you to see mathematics in a different light that you think would be useful to me? Or a book that helped open up this elusive world of mathematics, this world of deeper and higher levels of truth? I don't care if its from an applied or pure perspective, I just love mathematics.

Thank you for any help that you can give me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


You are a freshman. You shouldn't expect to become an expert in a year. You seem to be doing fine.
 


It's not more work, it's more time you need.

Time to allow it to stew in your subconcious. You acquire a vast amount of facts, ideas and techniques but it takes time for your mind to draw the connections. It will suddenly happen. Just keep doing the exercises. and good luck.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top