Martin & Shaw: Problem 3.5 - Understanding \tau ≈ c

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daaavde
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
Daaavde
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
From "Martin & Shaw", regarding problem 3.5 (sometimes it uses natural units "c=1"):

"The particle has [itex]\gamma = E/m \approx 10[/itex], hence [itex]\tau \approx c[/itex] (?) and the average distance is [itex]d \approx c \gamma \tau \approx 3 \times 10^{-14}m[/itex] if we assume a lifetime for the particle at rest of [itex]10^{-23}[/itex]."

I don't understand why [itex]\tau \approx c[/itex].
Since [itex]v = c \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{\gamma^2}}, v = 0.994 c[/itex] and I would agree that [itex]v \approx c[/itex], not [itex]\tau[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I am with you on that. In natural units where c=1 you get energy and mass in the same units, but not speed and time.
 
It's probably a typographical error, and it was supposed to say ##v \approx c##. That gives his result for the average distance: ##d = vt = v \gamma \tau \approx c \gamma \tau##.