Martin & Shaw: Problem 3.5 - Understanding \tau ≈ c

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daaavde
  • Start date Start date
Daaavde
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
From "Martin & Shaw", regarding problem 3.5 (sometimes it uses natural units "c=1"):

"The particle has [itex]\gamma = E/m \approx 10[/itex], hence [itex]\tau \approx c[/itex] (?) and the average distance is [itex]d \approx c \gamma \tau \approx 3 \times 10^{-14}m[/itex] if we assume a lifetime for the particle at rest of [itex]10^{-23}[/itex]."

I don't understand why [itex]\tau \approx c[/itex].
Since [itex]v = c \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{\gamma^2}}, v = 0.994 c[/itex] and I would agree that [itex]v \approx c[/itex], not [itex]\tau[/itex].
 
on Phys.org
Hmm, I am with you on that. In natural units where c=1 you get energy and mass in the same units, but not speed and time.
 
It's probably a typographical error, and it was supposed to say ##v \approx c##. That gives his result for the average distance: ##d = vt = v \gamma \tau \approx c \gamma \tau##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K