Martin & Shaw: Problem 3.5 - Understanding \tau ≈ c

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daaavde
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on problem 3.5 from "Martin & Shaw," which involves the relationship between the particle's lifetime (\tau) and the speed of light (c). The particle's Lorentz factor (\gamma) is approximately 10, leading to the conclusion that the average distance (d) is approximately 3 x 10-14 m, assuming a rest lifetime of 10-23 seconds. Participants express confusion regarding the statement \tau ≈ c, suggesting it is likely a typographical error and should read v ≈ c instead, clarifying the relationship between velocity, time, and distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz factor (\gamma) in special relativity
  • Familiarity with natural units where c=1
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics and lifetime calculations
  • Concept of distance calculation in relativistic contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz transformations on time and distance
  • Learn about natural units and their applications in theoretical physics
  • Explore the concept of relativistic velocity and its calculations
  • Investigate common typographical errors in physics literature and their impact on understanding
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers focusing on special relativity, particle physics, and the nuances of theoretical problem-solving in these fields.

Daaavde
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
From "Martin & Shaw", regarding problem 3.5 (sometimes it uses natural units "c=1"):

"The particle has \gamma = E/m \approx 10, hence \tau \approx c (?) and the average distance is d \approx c \gamma \tau \approx 3 \times 10^{-14}m if we assume a lifetime for the particle at rest of 10^{-23}."

I don't understand why \tau \approx c.
Since v = c \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{\gamma^2}}, v = 0.994 c and I would agree that v \approx c, not \tau.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I am with you on that. In natural units where c=1 you get energy and mass in the same units, but not speed and time.
 
It's probably a typographical error, and it was supposed to say ##v \approx c##. That gives his result for the average distance: ##d = vt = v \gamma \tau \approx c \gamma \tau##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K