Mass absorption coefficient of aluminium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the mass absorption coefficient of aluminium using a Geiger counter and radioactive source. Participants confirm that the accepted value for this coefficient can be found in NIST data for x-rays, suggesting that the experiment utilized a gamma source. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately graphing the absorption curve to compare experimental results with established values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass absorption coefficients in materials
  • Familiarity with Geiger counters and their operation
  • Basic knowledge of radioactive sources and their applications
  • Ability to graph data and interpret absorption curves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research NIST data for x-ray mass absorption coefficients
  • Learn about the differences between gamma and x-ray sources
  • Study methods for graphing absorption curves in experimental physics
  • Explore the principles of radiation detection using Geiger counters
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, experimental researchers, and professionals in radiation safety or materials science who are interested in the properties of aluminium and its interaction with radiation.

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
I was conducting an experiment, and we had to use a radioactive source and a Geigor counter, in conjunction with aluminium plates.

Using the data we produced we had to graph an absorption curve and obtain a value for the mass absorption coefficient of aluminium.

Then we had to compare this value with the accepted value for the mass absorption coefficient of aluminium.

Would anyone here know what the accepted value is, as I can't seem to locate it on Google, or anywhere else.

Thank you. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mass attenuation coefficient perhaps?
Of course, those that the NIST data for x-rays ... I'm guessing yours was a gamma source?
Now you know what to look up, you should be able to find it.
 
Simon Bridge said:
I'm guessing yours was a gamma source?

Yes.

I'll have another look. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
22K