Mass conservation in a sphere to find radial velocity of a flame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying mass conservation principles to a spherical control volume in the context of combustion. The user seeks clarification on which form of mass conservation is relevant for analyzing the radial velocity of a flame. They propose that the mass of combustion products, air, and fuel is uniformly distributed and that the flame front propagates without mixing or altering the density. Additionally, they suggest that the combustion rate may be constrained by the surface area as the flame expands spherically. Understanding these assumptions is crucial for accurately solving the problem presented in the combustion textbook.
Andrew1235
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Problem description: https://i.stack.imgur.com/7T2OM.png
Relevant Equations
Mass conservation for a spherical control volume
I am not sure what form of mass conservation to use to solve the above problem from An Introduction to Combustion by Stephen Turns. Can anyone explain what form of mass conservation applies to a sphere in this context?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Moved thread to advanced physics homework forum.
 
Andrew1235 said:
Homework Statement:: Problem description: https://i.stack.imgur.com/7T2OM.png
Relevant Equations:: Mass conservation for a spherical control volume

I am not sure what form of mass conservation to use to solve the above problem from An Introduction to Combustion by Stephen Turns. Can anyone explain what form of mass conservation applies to a sphere in this context?
I would assume the mass of the combustion products, air and fuel, are present throughout the volume and the flame front propagates without mixing or changing the density of that mixture pre and post combustion. I would also assume the combustion rate is limited by the available surface area as the flame expands in a spherical shape. But those assumptions could be way off.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top