Mass conservation in a sphere to find radial velocity of a flame

Andrew1235
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Problem description: https://i.stack.imgur.com/7T2OM.png
Relevant Equations
Mass conservation for a spherical control volume
I am not sure what form of mass conservation to use to solve the above problem from An Introduction to Combustion by Stephen Turns. Can anyone explain what form of mass conservation applies to a sphere in this context?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Moved thread to advanced physics homework forum.
 
Andrew1235 said:
Homework Statement:: Problem description: https://i.stack.imgur.com/7T2OM.png
Relevant Equations:: Mass conservation for a spherical control volume

I am not sure what form of mass conservation to use to solve the above problem from An Introduction to Combustion by Stephen Turns. Can anyone explain what form of mass conservation applies to a sphere in this context?
I would assume the mass of the combustion products, air and fuel, are present throughout the volume and the flame front propagates without mixing or changing the density of that mixture pre and post combustion. I would also assume the combustion rate is limited by the available surface area as the flame expands in a spherical shape. But those assumptions could be way off.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top