Conservation of Momentum Fluids Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the application of conservation laws in fluid dynamics, specifically conservation of mass, momentum, and Bernoulli's equation. The equations discussed include mass flow rate equations, momentum conservation equations, and pressure calculations in a control volume. Key points include the need for proper integration over defined areas and the importance of understanding the geometry of the system, particularly in spherical coordinates. The conversation highlights common misconceptions and clarifies the relationships between pressure, velocity, and force in fluid systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, specifically Bernoulli's equation
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in physics, particularly conservation of mass and momentum
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and their application in fluid flow problems
  • Ability to perform integrals over defined areas in fluid mechanics contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Bernoulli's equation in various fluid flow scenarios
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the Young-Laplace equation in fluid mechanics
  • Explore the use of spherical coordinates in solving fluid dynamics problems
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying conservation laws in fluid systems
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in fluid dynamics, engineers working on fluid flow problems, and educators teaching principles of fluid mechanics.

  • #31
joshmccraney said:
Momentum leaving would be $$\iint_{A_2} \rho \vec{V} (\vec{V} \cdot \hat{n})\, dS = \rho \pi R^2 V^2 = \frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2}$$. The backward pressure force would be $$-\iint_{A_2}P_2 \, \vec{dS} = -P_2 \pi r^2\hat{z}$$ where ##r## is the radius of the hemisphere.

Do you agree? Sorry for the late response; I'd been busy the last few days.
Yes, I do agree. So now, what is the momentum balance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Chestermiller said:
Yes, I do agree. So now, what is the momentum balance?
The momentum balance is $$-\pi r^2 V^2 \rho+\frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2} = -P_2 \pi r^2+ \left(P_1-\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{2 \pi r^2}\right)^2\right)\pi r^2 - F_{wall}$$. How does that look?
 
  • #33
joshmccraney said:
The momentum balance is $$-\pi r^2 V^2 \rho+\frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2} = -P_2 \pi r^2+ \left(P_1-\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{2 \pi r^2}\right)^2\right)\pi r^2 - F_{wall}$$. How does that look?
This looks good. But in the "momentum-in" term, I would have replaced V with ##\frac{Q}{2\pi r^2}##.

Now, to complete the solution to this problem, you need one additional relationship to eliminate ##Q^2## and replace it with something involving ##(p_1-p_2)##. Any ideas?

Chet
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
This looks good. But in the "momentum-in" term, I would have replaced V with ##\frac{Q}{2\pi r^2}##.

Now, to complete the solution to this problem, you need one additional relationship to eliminate ##Q^2## and replace it with something involving ##(p_1-p_2)##. Any ideas?

Chet

Let's apply Bernoulli at ##x\to-\infty## and ##x=0## along the x-axis. Then we have $$P_1 + \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi r^2} = P_2 + \frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi R^2} \implies\\ Q = \frac{(P_1-P_2)4\pi R^2}{\rho}$$

think we're done now, right?
 
  • #35
joshmccraney said:
Let's apply Bernoulli at ##x\to-\infty## and ##x=0## along the x-axis. Then we have $$P_1 + \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi r^2} = P_2 + \frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi R^2} \implies\\ Q = \frac{(P_1-P_2)4\pi R^2}{\rho}$$

think we're done now, right?
I get $$P_1=P_2+\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\right)^2$$
 
  • #36
Chestermiller said:
I get $$P_1=P_2+\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\right)^2$$
Oh my gosh, can't believe I didn't write that! It was late and I was sleepy. Yes, of course! So we substitute that into the mass balance for ##Q## and we're set, right?
 
  • #37
joshmccraney said:
Oh my gosh, can't believe I didn't write that! It was late and I was sleepy. Yes, of course! So we substitute that into the mass balance for ##Q## and we're set, right?
You mean you substitute that into the momentum balance, not the mass balance. Hopefully, that will lead to a result which matches the given answer.
 
  • #38
Chestermiller said:
You mean you substitute that into the momentum balance, not the mass balance. Hopefully, that will lead to a result which matches the given answer.
Yeeeeees, this is what I meant! Hahahaha evidently I'm still tired. Thanks a ton!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K