Conservation of Momentum Fluids Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a fluid dynamics problem involving conservation of momentum and Bernoulli's principle, set in the context of a control volume analysis. Participants are examining the relationships between pressure, velocity, and area in a flow system, with references to specific equations and integrals related to these principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of momentum equations and the definitions of areas involved in the flow. Questions arise regarding the integration limits and the assumptions made about pressure and velocity in different regions of the control volume. There is also exploration of the implications of using spherical coordinates and the relationship between pressure and force on the control volume.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's equations and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of integrals and the interpretation of pressure forces. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the definitions of areas and the application of fluid dynamics principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of fluid flow in a control volume, with specific attention to the assumptions of inviscid flow and constant density. There are references to specific geometrical configurations and the need for clarity in defining areas of integration.

  • #31
joshmccraney said:
Momentum leaving would be $$\iint_{A_2} \rho \vec{V} (\vec{V} \cdot \hat{n})\, dS = \rho \pi R^2 V^2 = \frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2}$$. The backward pressure force would be $$-\iint_{A_2}P_2 \, \vec{dS} = -P_2 \pi r^2\hat{z}$$ where ##r## is the radius of the hemisphere.

Do you agree? Sorry for the late response; I'd been busy the last few days.
Yes, I do agree. So now, what is the momentum balance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Chestermiller said:
Yes, I do agree. So now, what is the momentum balance?
The momentum balance is $$-\pi r^2 V^2 \rho+\frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2} = -P_2 \pi r^2+ \left(P_1-\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{2 \pi r^2}\right)^2\right)\pi r^2 - F_{wall}$$. How does that look?
 
  • #33
joshmccraney said:
The momentum balance is $$-\pi r^2 V^2 \rho+\frac{\rho Q^2}{\pi R^2} = -P_2 \pi r^2+ \left(P_1-\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{2 \pi r^2}\right)^2\right)\pi r^2 - F_{wall}$$. How does that look?
This looks good. But in the "momentum-in" term, I would have replaced V with ##\frac{Q}{2\pi r^2}##.

Now, to complete the solution to this problem, you need one additional relationship to eliminate ##Q^2## and replace it with something involving ##(p_1-p_2)##. Any ideas?

Chet
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
This looks good. But in the "momentum-in" term, I would have replaced V with ##\frac{Q}{2\pi r^2}##.

Now, to complete the solution to this problem, you need one additional relationship to eliminate ##Q^2## and replace it with something involving ##(p_1-p_2)##. Any ideas?

Chet

Let's apply Bernoulli at ##x\to-\infty## and ##x=0## along the x-axis. Then we have $$P_1 + \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi r^2} = P_2 + \frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi R^2} \implies\\ Q = \frac{(P_1-P_2)4\pi R^2}{\rho}$$

think we're done now, right?
 
  • #35
joshmccraney said:
Let's apply Bernoulli at ##x\to-\infty## and ##x=0## along the x-axis. Then we have $$P_1 + \lim_{r\to\infty}\frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi r^2} = P_2 + \frac{\rho Q}{4 \pi R^2} \implies\\ Q = \frac{(P_1-P_2)4\pi R^2}{\rho}$$

think we're done now, right?
I get $$P_1=P_2+\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\right)^2$$
 
  • #36
Chestermiller said:
I get $$P_1=P_2+\frac{\rho}{2}\left(\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\right)^2$$
Oh my gosh, can't believe I didn't write that! It was late and I was sleepy. Yes, of course! So we substitute that into the mass balance for ##Q## and we're set, right?
 
  • #37
joshmccraney said:
Oh my gosh, can't believe I didn't write that! It was late and I was sleepy. Yes, of course! So we substitute that into the mass balance for ##Q## and we're set, right?
You mean you substitute that into the momentum balance, not the mass balance. Hopefully, that will lead to a result which matches the given answer.
 
  • #38
Chestermiller said:
You mean you substitute that into the momentum balance, not the mass balance. Hopefully, that will lead to a result which matches the given answer.
Yeeeeees, this is what I meant! Hahahaha evidently I'm still tired. Thanks a ton!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K