Mass/escape velocity of a comet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quincy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the escape velocity and mass of Comet Tempel 1 after a projectile impact. It is noted that debris escaping the comet at 1.0 m/s can be analyzed using the conservation of energy principle, where the kinetic energy converts into potential energy as it rises. The initial kinetic energy calculation provided was incorrect, as it referred to the entire comet rather than the dust particles. Clarifications emphasize that while kinetic energy decreases, gravitational potential energy increases as the debris moves away from the comet. The conversation suggests using specific equations to simplify the problem and eliminate unknowns.
Quincy
Messages
228
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On July 4, 2005, the NASA spacecraft Deep Impact fired a projectile onto the surface of Comet Tempel 1. This comet is about 9.0 km across. Observations of surface debris released by the impact showed that dust with a speed as low as 1.0 m/s was able to escape the comet.
How far from the comet's center will this debris be when it has lost 90 % of its initial kinetic energy at the surface?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The equation for escape velocity can help determine the mass: 1.0 m/s = sqrt((2*G*M)/4500 m), M = 3.4 x 10^13.

KE at the surface = (1/2)(3.4 x 10^13)(1.0)^2 = 1.7 x 10^13 -- 90% of that is 1.53 x 10^13 J. So 90% of the kinetic energy has been converted into potential energy, right? Potential energy is (GMm)/r... but then I have two unknowns (m & r). How do I solve this? Is there another equation that can make the m cancel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you believe in conservation of energy, the potential and kinetic energies of an escaping object will always add to zero. So when an object has lost 90% of it's initial kinetic energy...

(1-0.90)\frac{1}{2}mv_e^2 + \frac{-GMm}{x} = 0

Hopefully that helps.

Also, there's a couple of things I would like to say about your attempt at a solution.

1) "KE at the surface = (1/2)(3.4 x 10^13)(1.0)^2 = 1.7 x 10^13" Not quite. That's the kinetic energy of the entire comet if it was moving at 1.0 m/s, not the initial kinetic energy of the dust.

2) "So 90% of the kinetic energy has been converted into potential energy, right?" Yes, in a sense. The dust loses kinetic energy in it's effort to do work against the force of gravity. While doing this work, the gravitational potential energy increases (gets less negative) so in a sense the kinetic energy is being converted into potential energy.

3) "Is there another equation that can make the m cancel?" If you use the hint I gave you, this will end up happening.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top