Mass Motion & Time: Acceleration & Momentum Impact on Measurable Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christov84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Motion Time
Christov84
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

As I was wondering to the train station the other day I was thinking about gravity bends time and how momentum might also affect this.

Anyways as you guys are really cluey about this so then I ask:

If say I was in a F1 car accelerating or even going at several G's more then resting(say around a really tight corner) would this have a significant impact on time(measurable atleast )?

What i am querying is if gravity generated by acceleration is more significant then moving at a certain constant speed(i.e momentum)?

Cheers

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Christov84 said:
If say I was in a F1 car accelerating or even going at several G's more then resting(say around a really tight corner) would this have a significant impact on time(measurable atleast )?
That is an interesting question. I will have to crunch the numbers, but my initial guess is that with modern atomic clocks you could indeed measure time dilation between the front and back of an accelerating F1 car.
 
The effect that DalsSpam describes equals ay/c2, where a is the car's acceleration, y is the distance between the front and back of the car, and c is the speed of light. In the driver's frame, this is interpreted as a gravitational time dilation; by the equivalence principle, the acceleration has the same effect as a gravitational field.

The special-relativistic time dilation effect is v2/2c2.

The ratio of the gravitational effect to the SR effect is 2ay/v2. For a race car that's already up to speed, I think this is going to be less than 1, although the two effects are on the same order of magnitude.

However, there is no real reason that y has to be the length of the car. For example, if the driver is looking at distant scenery, y is the distance to the scenery, and you get a Doppler shift that is partly attributable to relativistic time dilation. Here is a nice video showing an animated simulation, in a world where c is small so that the Doppler shift is nonnegligible:

One interesting effect is that you can have an event horizon. I don't think you can see the event horizon in the animated video, because it's behind you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top