Mass moving through Space/Time = Gravity?

Modern Viking
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I've wondered about this idea before, and thought I would put this together and get some opinions.

When it comes to electricity and magnetism, electricity can generate magnetism, and a moving magnet can generate an electric current.

When it comes to mass, gravity, and space/time, has there been a theory put forth were a mass moving through space/time will generate gravity? And, I suppose, would this mean the generation of gravity (if we could do that) would result in the existence of mass?

To me, it's a real puzzle as to just exactly how gravity is generated. It just seems like an odd characteristic of our universe that gravity is ever-present, constant, and everywhere evenly. When I say evenly, I'm referring to the fundamental bits and not the variations involved with the size collection of mass.

Thanks for reading the post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to general theory of relativity, a mass or even any form of energy 'generates' gravitation , to use your words. Gravitation is viewd as curvature of spacetime dependent on the energy distribution in spacetime.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top