Mass Transfer in a wetted-wall column

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around mass transfer in a wetted-wall column, focusing on the relationships between mass transfer coefficients, partial pressures, and concentrations of ammonia in both gas and liquid phases. Participants explore equations related to mass flux and the application of Henry's law.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Participants define variables related to mass transfer, including mass transfer coefficients for ammonia in both phases and concentrations at the interface.
  • One participant queries the expression for mass flux in terms of concentration and mass transfer coefficients, suggesting a relationship involving the difference between interface and bulk concentrations.
  • Another participant proposes a correction to an equation regarding mass flux in terms of partial pressures, indicating a need to revisit the relationship between partial pressure and concentration.
  • Henry's law is introduced to relate concentration and partial pressure, with a specific equation provided: C = PH.
  • A request is made to eliminate variables and express mass flux as a function of interface concentrations and partial pressures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of certain equations related to mass flux, with some equations being accepted while others are corrected. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final expression for mass flux in terms of the specified variables.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need to revisit foundational concepts and relationships, indicating potential gaps in understanding or assumptions that may affect the derivation of equations.

Rogue
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Ammonia in gas is being absorbed by water in a wtted-wall column. At one level of the column, the following data applies:
Gas phase mass transfer co-efficient:
5.22 x 10^-9 kmol m^-2s^-1Pa^-1

Liquid Phase mass transfer coefficient:
3.88 x 10^-5 m s^-1

Henrys constant 0.955kPa (kmol m^-3)^-1


Use the following additional information to find the mass transfer flux in the column:

mole fraction of ammonia in liquid* 1.351 x 10^-3
mole fraction of ammonia in gas* 0.065
total pressure of system 1.013 bar
mole mass of ammonia 17
Relevant Equations
Attempt at solution

Using Ca =55.51xa

Ammonia in liquid:
55.51 x 1.351 x 10^-3
=0.075kmol^-3

Ammonia in gas:
55.51 x 0.065
=3.608kmol^-3


I know my end equation needs to be in the order of:
Na = kc x (Ca1 - Ca2)


I attempted:

=(4.42 x 10^-6) x (3.608 - 0.075)

= 1.562 x 10^-5


But have since been advised that I need to be calculating partial pressure, molar mass transfer flux and equivalent molar concentration and to substitute these into my final equation.
At this point, I am finding myself to be very confused.
Please can someone assist me as this particular question seems to have me completely confounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let:

##k_L## = mass transfer coefficient of ammonia in the liquid phase
##k_g## = mass transfer coefficient of ammonia in the gas phase
##p_{\infty}## = partial pressure of ammonia in the bulk of the gas phase
##p## = partial pressure of ammonia in the gas phase at the gas-liquid interface
##C_{\infty}## = concentration of ammonia in the bulk of the liquid phase
##C## = concentration of ammonia in the liquid phase at the gas-liquid interface
H = Henry's law constant

What is the mass flux ##\phi## in terms of ##k_L##, ##C_{\infty}##, and C?
What is the same mass flux ##\phi## interns of ##k_g##, ##p_{\infty}##, and p?
What is the relationship between p, C, and H?
 
Thanks for the response Chester.

Am I right in thinking?:

## \phi = k \iota (C - C \alpha)##

Answer = 1.371 x10^-4

## \phi = k \varrho (P - P \alpha)##

In terms of calculating partial pressure - I'll have to re-visit this to refresh my memory along with the relationship between p, C and H.
 
Rogue said:
Thanks for the response Chester.

Am I right in thinking?:

## \phi = k \iota (C - C \alpha)##
This equation is correct
## \phi = k \varrho (P - P \alpha)##
This equation is incorrect. It should read:$$\phi = k \varrho ( P \alpha-P)$$

So you have $$\phi = k_{\iota} (C - C _{\alpha})=k _{\rho} ( P _{\alpha}-P)$$
In terms of calculating partial pressure - I'll have to re-visit this to refresh my memory along with the relationship between p, C and H.
Henry's law relates C and P by: $$C = PH$$
Now, please eliminate C and P between these three equations, and express ##\phi## as a function of ##C_{\alpha}## and ##P_{\alpha}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K