Masses hanging on massless meter stick problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter FlipStyle1308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless Meter
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two masses attached to a massless meter stick, focusing on the effects of removing one mass and the subsequent calculations of force and angular acceleration. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically torque and angular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of torque and angular acceleration, questioning the values and distances used in their calculations. There is an emphasis on understanding the setup, including the pivot point and the forces acting on the system.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on calculating torque and have discussed the conditions for equilibrium. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem setup, with some participants expressing confusion about the information provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks clarity regarding the pivot point of the meter stick and the conditions under which the forces are applied. There is mention of a string supporting the system, which adds complexity to the analysis.

FlipStyle1308
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Two masses (mA = 3 kg, mB = 6 kg) are attached to a (massless) meter stick, at the 0 and 75 cm marks, respectively.

a. Now, if mass B was removed, how much force would need to be exerted at the 100 cm mark in order to keep the meter stick level?

b. Now, if mass B was removed, and no additional force was supplied, calculate the size of the angular acceleration of the meter stick at that instant.

For a I was clueless on how to approach the problem, but for b, I used angular acceleration = torque/inertia, and got 0.8889, but got it wrong. I tried it again, plugging in different values for r and F, and got 13.066, and still got the problem wrong. I thnk my problem is that I am not using the correct values to solve this problem. Anybody know exactly which values I should use? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FlipStyle1308 said:
Two masses (mA = 3 kg, mB = 6 kg) are attached to a (massless) meter stick, at the 0 and 75 cm marks, respectively.

a. Now, if mass B was removed, how much force would need to be exerted at the 100 cm mark in order to keep the meter stick level?

b. Now, if mass B was removed, and no additional force was supplied, calculate the size of the angular acceleration of the meter stick at that instant.

For a I was clueless on how to approach the problem, but for b, I used angular acceleration = torque/inertia, and got 0.8889, but got it wrong. I tried it again, plugging in different values for r and F, and got 13.066, and still got the problem wrong. I thnk my problem is that I am not using the correct values to solve this problem. Anybody know exactly which values I should use? Thanks!

as it stands, the question does not make any sense. there is information missing. The ruler is resting on a pivot somehwere? Is it supported at the center??
 
Sorry...I took out the parts I solved already...maybe this will help...

The system is then hung from a string, so that it stays horizontal. The string is placed 50 cm, from mass A.
 
FlipStyle1308 said:
Sorry...I took out the parts I solved already...maybe this will help...

The system is then hung from a string, so that it stays horizontal. The string is placed 50 cm, from mass A.

Ok. Without that information it was impossible to answer.

You must impose that the net torque is zero. What is the torque exerted by mass A? The other torque must be minus that. Knowing the force, it is easy to find how far it must be from where the string is attached
 
Wait, you confused me...which part are you on, a or b?
 
FlipStyle1308 said:
Wait, you confused me...which part are you on, a or b?

well, I was doing part a first :approve:
 
Okay, so part a haha. Torque exerted by mass A is 22.05, right?
 
FlipStyle1308 said:
Okay, so part a haha. Torque exerted by mass A is 22.05, right?

?? How did you get this? torque = force * distance from the fulcrum and force = mg
 
distance = 0.75
mass = 3
gravity = 9.8

I probably have the distance wrong, should it be 0.5?
 
  • #10
FlipStyle1308 said:
distance = 0.75
mass = 3
gravity = 9.8

I probably have the distance wrong, should it be 0.5?
Yes. torque = F d (in magnitude..the sign tells you the direction) The distance there is always the distance between where the force si applied and the axis of rotation (if the force is perpendicular to the line connecting the fulcrum and the point where the force is applied)
 
  • #11
Okay, so 14.7 N for torque.
 
  • #12
FlipStyle1308 said:
Okay, so 14.7 N for torque.

ok. The sign depends on whether th emass is to the left or right of the suspension point. Let's say it is to the left and creates a counterclockwise torque, then it is positive.

The other force will create a torque of - F * 0.50 m (since it is also 50 cm from the axis of rotation) Imposing that the sum of the two gives a net torque euqal to zero gives you the value of F (in that case, it is trivial because the two forces act at the same distance from the axis of rotation! so of course you will find a value equal to mg !)
 
  • #13
So I'm correct?
 
  • #14
FlipStyle1308 said:
So I'm correct?
yes, your torque is correct
 
  • #15
Thank you! So what do I do from there lol?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
FlipStyle1308 said:
Thank you! So what do I do from there lol?

My post #12 gives the way to answer part a.

I have to log off soon. Good luck
 
  • #17
Oh okay, I got part a, let me know when you can work on part b!
 
  • #18
Hmm...okay, for this one I tried...

I = mr^2 = (3)(0.75)^2 = 1.6875
angular acceleration = torque/I = 1.47/1.6875 = 8.711 rad/s^2.

Is this correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
23K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
42K