Massive Particles in Sonic & Slow Light Black Holes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the Penrose process in sonic black holes and its analogs. The user explores the implications of massive particles and phonons in sonic black holes, referencing key papers including the Kerr black hole analog (arXiv:1802.08306) and the limitations of slow light black holes (arXiv:gr-qc/0303028). It is established that while slow light cannot serve as an analog for quantum features of black holes, the Penrose process may still be applicable in a classical context within slow light analogs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Penrose process in black hole physics
  • Familiarity with sonic black holes and their analogs
  • Knowledge of phonons as massless particle analogs
  • Basic principles of classical versus quantum features in black hole analogs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Penrose process in classical physics
  • Study the properties and behaviors of phonons in sonic black holes
  • Examine the limitations of slow light black holes in quantum analogs
  • Explore further works by Unruh on black hole analogs and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, astrophysicists studying black hole analogs, and graduate students focusing on quantum mechanics and general relativity.

luke m
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I am working on a research project where I intend to describe what the Penrose process would like in a sonic black hole. I have found what a rotating (Kerr) black hole looks like in the sonic analog:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.08306.pdf
I have also found that the analog of massless particles would be phonons:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1510/1510.00621.pdf
The Penrose process requires massive particles to my understanding, what is the analog of this in a sonic black hole? If this is not possible in a sonic black hole, would it be possible in a different type of analog, like a slow light black hole?
Slow light black holes: https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0303028.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Per your last reference, slow light cannot be used as an analog for quantum features of black holes. In fact, I was at a talk by Unruh on black hole analogs, and asked him this question (without knowing he had previously considered, analyzed, and rejected this possibility). He briefly explained the issues with it. At the time, I was really impressed with how he dealt with the question. Per your reference, I now see he had previously considered this!
 
PAllen said:
Per your last reference, slow light cannot be used as an analog for quantum features of black holes. In fact, I was at a talk by Unruh on black hole analogs, and asked him this question (without knowing he had previously considered, analyzed, and rejected this possibility). He briefly explained the issues with it. At the time, I was really impressed with how he dealt with the question. Per your reference, I now see he had previously considered this!
On the other hand, the Penrose process can be treated as purely classical, so slow light analogs may be workable. I just don’t know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K