Massive Particles in Sonic & Slow Light Black Holes

luke m
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I am working on a research project where I intend to describe what the Penrose process would like in a sonic black hole. I have found what a rotating (Kerr) black hole looks like in the sonic analog:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.08306.pdf
I have also found that the analog of massless particles would be phonons:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1510/1510.00621.pdf
The Penrose process requires massive particles to my understanding, what is the analog of this in a sonic black hole? If this is not possible in a sonic black hole, would it be possible in a different type of analog, like a slow light black hole?
Slow light black holes: https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0303028.pdf
 
Last edited:
Per your last reference, slow light cannot be used as an analog for quantum features of black holes. In fact, I was at a talk by Unruh on black hole analogs, and asked him this question (without knowing he had previously considered, analyzed, and rejected this possibility). He briefly explained the issues with it. At the time, I was really impressed with how he dealt with the question. Per your reference, I now see he had previously considered this!
 
PAllen said:
Per your last reference, slow light cannot be used as an analog for quantum features of black holes. In fact, I was at a talk by Unruh on black hole analogs, and asked him this question (without knowing he had previously considered, analyzed, and rejected this possibility). He briefly explained the issues with it. At the time, I was really impressed with how he dealt with the question. Per your reference, I now see he had previously considered this!
On the other hand, the Penrose process can be treated as purely classical, so slow light analogs may be workable. I just don’t know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K