Mastering Derivation: Techniques for Simplifying Formulas in Physics and Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving
Click For Summary
Mastering derivation in physics and math involves understanding relationships between formulas, such as proportional and inverse relationships. Simplifying complex equations often requires a solid grasp of underlying concepts and mathematical techniques, including calculus. One effective method is to solve two formulas for a common variable and equate them, eliminating the variable in question. Dimensional analysis can also serve as a helpful tool to ensure consistency in units across equations. Overall, mastering these techniques can significantly aid in deriving and simplifying formulas.
DDS
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
I just have a quick question. I know that in physics and any other math, you can short cut your way if you know various relationships and thus you can derive various forumlas from a few simple ones. Is there any trick to doing this or an easier way, because i have never really been exceptionally well at it but i could always squeeze by.

If anyone knows any methods or tricks is it possible to let me know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some notions about what formulae for certain types of relationships look like - proportional, inversely proportional, geometric, and so on. The general problem of translating a relationship into a nice expression is very difficult. It eventually does lead to very complicated formulae for things like QM.
 
DDS said:
If anyone knows any methods or tricks is it possible to let me know
Try here for converting units (which is sort of the same think. You do have to construct the equation yourself). For other thinks it takes understanding of what you are doing and quiet a bit of maths. e.g trapiezum rule in maths needs the knowledge of calculus so that you can see how to use the area of a trapiezum to work out the rule with different 'heights'.

What sort of relationships/forumulae are you on about?

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
One trick I teach my students:
Often you will have two formulas with a common variable. If you solve both formulas for that variable, and then set them equal to each other, then that variable goes away. This is handy if you trying to figure out a problem where one seemingly important variable is always unknown.
 
I suppose dimensional analysis helps here too.

The units of both sides of your equation (when expressed in their basic terms) should always be the same. You can often use this as a guide.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
806
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K