Material Science -- using materials without specifying crystal directions

Click For Summary
Most material properties are reported without specifying crystal directions because, in many practical applications, materials behave isotropically, especially when considering polycrystalline structures where grains are randomly oriented. For instance, the bulk stiffness of polycrystalline iron averages around 210 GPa, despite individual grains exhibiting varying stiffness based on their crystallographic orientation. However, in certain applications, such as single-crystal turbine blades, crystal orientation can significantly impact performance. Amorphous materials, lacking a defined crystal structure, further support the notion of isotropy. Overall, while some materials exhibit directional properties, many common applications can rely on averaged isotropic values.
Evilavatar2
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Why in most practical applications, most materials properties are given without specifying crystal directions. Are they trying to say all materials are isotropic?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Evilavatar2 said:
Why in most practical applications, most materials properties are given without specifying crystal directions. Are they trying to say all materials are isotropic?
Can you give some examples of the applications you have in mind? Certainly there are applications where crystal axes do matter...
 
Evilavatar2 said:
Why in most practical applications, most materials properties are given without specifying crystal directions. Are they trying to say all materials are isotropic?

What are you talking about? Many material properties are measure in both the transverse and machine direction. Of course amorphous materials have no crystal structure.
 
Evilavatar2 said:
Why in most practical applications, most materials properties are given without specifying crystal directions. Are they trying to say all materials are isotropic?

Polycrystalline materials are approximately isotropic when the length scale of interest is much larger than the grain size and the grains are randomly oriented. (Subtlety: materials can have a so-called "texture," which in a materials science context refers not to roughness but to a predominant crystalline orientation, due to processing history.) For example, a handful of iron is going to have a bulk stiffness of 210 GPa, even though the (111) stiffness of each microscopic grain is 270 GPa and the (100) stiffness is 125 GPa. For that matter, the stiffness of low-alloy steels is generally also around 200 GPa because steel is predominantly polycrystalline iron. For certain bulk properties such as stiffness, what you're measuring at the macroscopic scale is essentially the average value of a huge number of randomly oriented microscopic grains.
 
berkeman said:
... Certainly there are applications where crystal axes do matter...

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/issues/june-2015-online/jewel-in-the-crown-rolls-royces-single-crystal-turbine-blade-casting-foundry/
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Nidum said:
https://www.theengineer.co.uk/issues/june-2015-online/jewel-in-the-crown-rolls-royces-single-crystal-turbine-blade-casting-foundry/
That's truly amazing! Thanks for sharing :smile:
 
I need to anneal 5052 aluminum for a home project. Google has given me mixed results on how to do this. Short version is that I'm doing some heavy forming on a piece of 5052-H32 and I'm running into issues with it work hardening. I've tried the Sharpie trick with a propane torch. But I'm not sure this is doing anything. I'm also seeing conflicting opinions whether to quench or air cool. So I'm looking for some expert opinions. (Oven heating is not an option due to size.) Thanks. edit: The...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
473
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K