Math Induction: Where Does the >2xk Come From?

coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Please refer to the image attached.

Where does the > 2 x k come from?

Based on the proposition, shouldn't it be > k+1?
 

Attachments

  • 20130402_173018.jpg
    20130402_173018.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 474
Mathematics news on Phys.org
look two lines above the questioned statement.
 
I got it, thanks.
 
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?
 
coconut62 said:
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?
If k > 1, then 2k > k + 1.

2k = k + 1 only if k = 1.
 
Greater and Greater-Equal

coconut62 said:
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?


The propisition is true since it says 2^{k+1} > k + k \ge k+1 and together 2^{k+1} > k+1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top