Math Induction: Where Does the >2xk Come From?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical proposition involving the expression 2^(k+1) and its relationship to k+1. Participants question the validity of stating that 2^(k+1) is greater than k+1, particularly for values of k greater than 1. It is clarified that for k > 1, the inequality 2k > k + 1 holds true, reinforcing the proposition's validity. The conclusion is that the proposition remains true as it asserts 2^(k+1) is indeed greater than k+1 under the given conditions. The conversation emphasizes understanding the implications of mathematical inequalities in proofs.
coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Please refer to the image attached.

Where does the > 2 x k come from?

Based on the proposition, shouldn't it be > k+1?
 

Attachments

  • 20130402_173018.jpg
    20130402_173018.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 475
Mathematics news on Phys.org
look two lines above the questioned statement.
 
I got it, thanks.
 
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?
 
coconut62 said:
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?
If k > 1, then 2k > k + 1.

2k = k + 1 only if k = 1.
 
Greater and Greater-Equal

coconut62 said:
But one more thing: 2^(k+1) is equal or bigger than k+1. Then it's not necessarily bigger than k+1. How can we say that the proposition is true for that case?


The propisition is true since it says 2^{k+1} > k + k \ge k+1 and together 2^{k+1} > k+1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top