Math Problem Solving: How Much Is Enough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathsciguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the balance between enjoying the abstract concepts of mathematics and the challenges of practical problem-solving. The individual expresses a struggle with calculations, noting that while they can grasp theoretical ideas and proofs, practicing problem sets is mentally taxing and time-consuming. They emphasize the importance of improving calculation skills to achieve better grades in college, particularly under exam conditions. The consensus suggests that to perform well, one should aim to solve 10-12 difficult problems within a three-hour exam, ideally completing them in two hours to allow time for review. The individual acknowledges that the definition of "difficult" varies based on their current knowledge and recognizes the need for consistent practice to enhance their problem-solving abilities.
mathsciguy
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
When I study mathematics, I just do it leisurely and at my own pace. Over the course of my whole mathematics education, I've enjoyed learning the abstract ideas/concept in it, the problem is I'm a bit clumsy doing calculations. I can study and do proofs/concepts but practicing problem sets eats my focus big time and I get tired doing it. Now, I can enjoy reading and learning as much math as I want but I really need to brush up with my calculation/problem solving skills, as I'd rather have good grades in college (I tend to solve really slow) at the same time. The question is just how much practice is enough?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the level you are trying to get to IMO.

The average exams I've had thus far indicate that you should be able to solve at least 10-12 more DIFFICULT problems (many steps) in the 3 hours provided. However, I would say you should be able to solve the 10-12 in 2 hours and have an hour for review--IMO, of course.
 
10-12 difficult problems in 2 hours might still be a little hard to pull of, considering that 'difficult' is something within the reach of my mathematical knowledge. That is to say I just have to know when to throw in those knowledge for the given problems. I guess I just have to do as much as I can.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top