How do I construct a cubic inequality with specific solution sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iluvrotinsaag
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To construct a cubic inequality with the solution sets -2 < x < 0 and x > 3, one can start with the polynomial (x + 2)(x)(x - 3) = x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x. This polynomial is zero at the points -2, 0, and 3, indicating where it changes sign. By testing values in the intervals defined by these roots, it can be determined that the inequality x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x > 0 holds for x < -2 and 0 < x < 3. Conversely, if the problem required the complement set, the inequality x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x < 0 would apply. The key takeaway is to analyze the polynomial's behavior around its roots to construct the desired inequality.
iluvrotinsaag
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Math problems!

I understand how to solve this inequality, but i do not know what sign to put (greater than or less than) in my answer. I would really appreciate it if someone could explain this concept to me. THanks

Write a cubic inequality that has this solution:
-2<X<0, x>3
(X)(X+2)(X-3)
(X^2 +2X) (X-3)
X^3 - X^2 - 6X (< or >) 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Whoa, hold on. What's the inequality?

x>3 into the expression x^3 - x^2 - 6x?

What's the -2<x<0?

cookiemonster
 
teh cubic inequality is:
-2<X<0 and x>3
 
I've never heard of a cubic inequality before (other than a cubic polynomial used in an inequality), so I'll just butt out of this before I make a fool of myself again.

cookiemonster
 
you can always check if you have the inequality the right way round you do not need a method for checking if its "<" or ">" other than subbing in points

for example
when x=4, the statement x> 3 is true
and the statement 4^3-4^2-6*4=24 > 0 is true so the answer better be
x^3 - x^2 - 6x> 0
not x^3 - x^2 - 6x <0.


There is no mystery here just sketch the curve y=x^3 - x^2 - 6x
and notice there are two regions above the x-axis, one region has the property that all x values are between -2 and 0 (-2< x< 0) and the other region is x>3
 
Apparently the problem is not to "solve an inequality" but to construct an inequality having all numbers between -2 and 0 and all numbers above 3 as solutions.

Start by constructing an equation:

(x-(-2))(x-0)(x-3)= (x+2)(x)(x-3)= x3+ 5x2+ 6x= 0 is 0 at exactly -2, 0, and 3. Since a polynomial is continuous, it can change from positive to negative and vice-versa only where it is 0.

Now check what happens in between: at x= 1, for example,
13+ 5(12)+ 6(1)= 1+ 5+ 6= 11> 0. Therefore, the inequality x3+ 5x2+ 6x> 0 has x<-2 and 0< x< 3 as solution set.

IF the problem had asked for the complement set: -2< x< 0, x> 3, then we would have tried x= -1, say, and found that
(-1)3+ 5(-1)2+ 6(-1)= -1+5-6= -2< 0.
The inequality x3+ 5x2+ 6x< 0 has that solution set.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top