Math Puzzle: Find the Missing Piece

  • Thread starter Thread starter BicycleTree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
AI Thread Summary
A math puzzle is presented that focuses on finding a missing piece, described as more mathematical than a typical brain teaser. The original poster has shared additional insights and updates related to the puzzle, encouraging engagement from the community. Despite being posted in the Brain Teasers forum, there has been limited response to the challenge. The poster seeks further discussion and solutions from others interested in mathematical problems. The conversation highlights the need for more participation in solving the puzzle.
BicycleTree
Messages
518
Reaction score
0
I posted this in the Brain Teasers forum, but nobody's really taking a stab at it. It is more mathematical than a brain teaser. This is not homework; hope it's all right posting the link here.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=609930
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I figured out some more stuff on this and posted it. (see link)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top