Mathematica problem, nontrivial solution for matrix equation Ax=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Uncle_John
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica Matrix
Click For Summary
To obtain a non-trivial solution for the matrix equation Ax=0, the matrix A must not be one-to-one, which occurs when its determinant is zero, indicating that zero is an eigenvalue. To find eigenvalues, solve the equation det(A - λI) = 0, which yields a polynomial of degree n for an n x n matrix. If λ is indeed an eigenvalue, the equation (A - λI)x = 0 will have non-trivial solutions, meaning some equations will be dependent. If consistently obtaining x=0, it suggests that the assumed eigenvalue may not be valid. Providing a specific example could help identify potential errors in the calculations.
Uncle_John
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey, how can i get a non trivial solution from matrix equation Ax=0

more precisely, i want to calculate eigenvectors : (M- a_1*I)x = 0, i keep getting x=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation Ax= 0 has a non-trivial solution if and only if A is not one-to-one. That is the same as saying that its determant is 0 and that it has 0 as an eigenvalue. The standard way to find an eigenvalue, \lambda for matrix A is to solve the equation det(A- \lambda I)= 0. If A is an n by n matrix, that will be a polynomial equation of degree n and so has n solutions (not necessarily all distinct, not necessarily real).

IF \lambda really is an eigenvalue, then Ax= \lambda x or <br /> Ax- \lambda x= (A- \lambda I)x= 0 has, by definition of "eigenvalue", a non-trivial solution. That is, some of the equations you get by looking at individual components will be dependent. Note that x= 0 always will be a solution, just not the only one.

Perhaps if you posted a specific example, we could point out errors. The most obvious one, if you "keep getting x=0", is that what you think is an eigenvalue really isn't!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K