Mathematical Induction: Proving Inequalities with k and k+1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of mathematical induction to prove the inequality \(2^n \geq n + 1\). Participants are exploring the steps required to show that if the inequality holds for \(n = k\), it must also hold for \(n = k + 1\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish a relationship between \(2^k\) and \(k + 1\) to derive \(2^{k+1}\) and \(k + 2\). There are discussions on how to manipulate inequalities and the logic behind choosing specific values for \(c\) and \(d\) in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified a potential approach using the relationship \(ac \geq bd\) to transition from \(2^k \geq k + 1\) to \(2^{k+1} \geq k + 2\). However, there remains uncertainty about the logical steps involved and how to effectively prove the necessary relations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the algebraic manipulation required to transition between the forms of the inequality, as well as the notation used in the discussion. Participants express a lack of familiarity with the reasoning process that leads to the conclusion.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Hello, I am working on the problem in the attached image regarding induction based on the inequality

2^n \geq n + 1

I am confused how to do this by proving that if it is assumed to be true for ## n = k ##, then how it is true for ##n = k + 1##. The way I see it, you would just do ## 2^{k+1} \geq (k+1) + 1##. The answer is ##2(k+1) \geq k + 2##, but I do not understand it.
 

Attachments

  • induction.jpg
    induction.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 463
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, for inline latex ##\#\### before and after the expression.
'You would just do' : not exactly, it is what you have to prove assuming ##2^k \geq k+1## holds.
 
Hint:
Let ##a,b,c,d## be four positive numbers such that ##a\gt b## and ##c\gt d##, then we have: $$ac\gt bd.$$ For your particular example you have ##2^{k}\geqslant k+1## and you need to find a relation ##c\gt d## such that when you apply the above rule you get $$2^{k+1}\geqslant (k+1)+1.$$ Can you find such relation and prove it?
 
So are you saying in this case for ##a > b##, then ## a = 2^k## and ##b = k+1##. Then I need a ##c## and ##d##. Well, I think ## c## would be equal to ##2##, but I need something such that ##d*(k+1) = k + 2##.

Hence
d = k+2/k+1

Then it follows
ac \geq bd

Thus,
2(2^k) \geq (k+1)(k+2/{k+1})
2^{k+1} \geq k+2
 
Last edited:
You got it right for ##c##, can you now solve the equation ##d(k+1)=k+2## for ##d##?
 
I got it now, but how the heck would I ever know to do that? I would have never guessed that would be the way to prove it. How is it logical to approach the problem in that manner? Also, how do I get the k+1 to be on the bottom of the fraction?
 
Response to your edited post:

You now found the relation ##c\gt d## to go from ##2^k\geqslant k+1## to ##2^{k+1}\geqslant k+2##. But you still need to prove that relation, do you know how to proceed?

I got it now, but how the heck would I ever know to do that? I would have never guessed that would be the way to prove it. How is it logical to approach the problem in that manner? Also, how do I get the k+1 to be on the bottom of the fraction?

You got ##k+1## in the bottom of the fraction by solving for ##d##: $$d(k+1)=k+2\implies\require{cancel}d\cancel{(k+1)}\dfrac{1}{\cancel{k+1}}=(k+2)\dfrac1{k+1}\implies d=\dfrac{k+2}{k+1}.$$ The approach to this problem boils down to figuring out a way to go from ##2^k\geqslant k+1## into ##2^{k+1}\geqslant k+2##. It's basically just what AlephZero did but written in a more detailed manner.
 
Maylis said:
I would have never guessed that would be the way to prove it.

Neither would I :smile:

On the other hand, if you assume ##2^k \ge k + 1## and you want to show that ##2^{k+1} \ge (k+1) + 1##, then

## 2^{k+1} = 2(2^k) \ge 2(k+1) =2k +2 \ge k + 2## when ##k \ge 0##.
 
Yes, for ##c > d##, you get ##2 \geq k+2/k+1 ##, which by algebraic manipulation is ## 2(k+1) \geq k+2##. How do I get the fraction to look like yours, with the fraction being on the bottom? As well as the slash going through indicating canceling a term.
 
  • #10
Maylis said:
Yes, for ##c > d##, you get ##2 \geq k+2/k+1 ##, which by algebraic manipulation is ## 2(k+1) \geq k+2##. How do I get the fraction to look like yours, with the fraction being on the bottom? As well as the slash going through indicating canceling a term.

For the fraction use \frac{}{} for example \frac{x+2}{x+1} will produce ##\frac{x+2}{x+1}##. For the slash you first have to write \require{cancel} then to use the \cancel{} command where you put what you want to slash inside the brackets, therefore \require{cancel}\cancel{x+1} will produce ##\require{cancel}\cancel{x+1}##.
 
  • #11
HakimPhilo said:
It's basically just what AlephZero did but written in a more detailed manner.

I wouldn't call it "detailed". I would describe it a very confusing explanation which isn't very helpful for understanding the simple induction step.
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
I wouldn't call it "detailed". I would describe it a very confusing explanation which isn't very helpful for understanding the simple induction step.

I could have proceeded as AlephZero (which is what I originally did but then got a warning with my post being deleted) but the OP specifically mentions that he didn't know where the need for ##2(k+1) \geqslant k + 2## came from.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K