Mathematics book that's not a textbook, but for intuition?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding mathematics books that focus on building intuition rather than serving as traditional textbooks. Participants explore various levels and subjects of mathematics, particularly emphasizing calculus and its foundational concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for mathematics books that emphasize intuition over formalism.
  • Several participants inquire about the specific level and subject matter of mathematics the original poster is interested in, suggesting calculus as a suitable focus.
  • Recommendations include "What is Mathematics?" by Courant, "How to Solve It" by Polya, and Morris Kline's calculus book, with some participants noting that Kline's work can be verbose.
  • Another participant suggests "Experiencing Geometry" by David Henderson and "Geometry and the Imagination" by David Hilbert as intuitive resources.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of certain books for someone who has completed Calculus I and II, suggesting that more advanced texts like Spivak or Apostol may be necessary for deeper understanding.
  • There is a discussion about the potential usefulness of Thomas' Calculus and Boas' Mathematical Methods, with varying opinions on their suitability for the original poster's needs.
  • One participant mentions the value of reviewing calculus notes available online, specifically recommending Paul's Online Notes for their clarity and organization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of intuition in mathematics but present multiple competing views on which books best achieve this goal. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most suitable recommendations for the original poster's specific needs.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of mathematical background and mastery, which influences their recommendations. There is also a recognition that some suggested books may be considered textbooks, despite their intuitive insights.

ColtonCM
Messages
33
Reaction score
2
Does anyone know of any mathematics books that are not textbooks? Something that has problems but is more focused on building mathematical intuition rather than just laying out formulas and what not.

This is a pretty vague question/descriptor for a book, my apologies. If you need more clarification just ask me.

Thanks,

Colton
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ColtonCM said:
This is a pretty vague question/descriptor for a book, my apologies. If you need more clarification just ask me.

What level of mathematics? What subject matter? Linear Algebra? Calculus? Or do you merely want an interesting math book?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
What level of mathematics? What subject matter? Linear Algebra? Calculus? Or do you merely want an interesting math book?

I think Calculus would be a good bet for right now as my mathematical knowledge does not extend beyond that.
 
Try "What is mathematics?" from Courant.
 
kith said:
Try "What is mathematics?" from Courant.
Thanks!
 
try experiencing geometry by david henderson. and anschaulich geometrie, [or intuitive geometry], by david hilbert, english title: geometry and the imagination.
 
Even tho serge lang books are considered textbooks. They have given me intuitive insight in some fields of mathematics. Polya," How to Solve It," is very insightful. Helps you think in a pedagogical way how to solve problems.

Morris Kline Calculus is also intuitive. However, the author can be a bit verbose.
 
MidgetDwarf said:
Even tho serge lang books are considered textbooks. They have given me intuitive insight in some fields of mathematics. Polya," How to Solve It," is very insightful. Helps you think in a pedagogical way how to solve problems.

Morris Kline Calculus is also intuitive. However, the author can be a bit verbose.

I added the Serge Lang calculus book to my wishlist as well as the other two books you mentioned. Thanks a bunch!
 
Hmm do you know calculus already? Before you buy please answer this question.
 
  • #10
MidgetDwarf said:
Hmm do you know calculus already? Before you buy please answer this question.

I've taken Calculus I and II at the college level, but I am far from possessing a "mastery" of this area of mathematics. I could benefit from reviewing certain chapters at a time from a book like this.

I want to truly develop a mastery of mathematics as a language as I work towards my astrophysics PhD (still undergraduate right now). I'm ready to commit for the years-long journey this is going to be. I've transitioned from that pre-college mindset of "ewww math problems" to actually enjoying the process of solving them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MidgetDwarf
  • #11
ColtonCM said:
I've taken Calculus I and II at the college level, but I am far from possessing a "mastery" of this area of mathematics. I could benefit from reviewing certain chapters at a time from a book like this.

I want to truly develop a mastery of mathematics as a language as I work towards my astrophysics PhD (still undergraduate right now). I'm ready to commit for the years-long journey this is going to be. I've transitioned from that pre-college mindset of "ewww math problems" to actually enjoying the process of solving them.

Not sure if I can answer this. To understand calculus you have to work from a book like spivak or Apostol. However, as a physics major it may be too much.

I believe Kline book would be to easy for you since you have done calculus 2. The book that gave me a better understanding of calculus was the 3rd ed of thomas calculus with analytic geometry. It is a textbook, however the author explains the why in good fashion. For instance his derivation of the shell method is very easy to follow and understand, where stewart made the the proof look uggly and messy.

Not sure if you are trying to understand the application side of the math in regards to physics. Many people recommend Boas mathematical methods, however since I am a math major I have no knowledge of boas. Lang calculus book goes a bit more into detail, however having seen calculus 2 working through Spivak would be a better idea. But Spivak is more an introductory to analysis book.
 
  • #12
I would recommend looking into multivariable calculus and differential equations after having a solid understanding of calculus. These will reinforce your understanding of calculus in general. (Definitely multivariable calculus (i.e. calc 3) before doing differential equations).

I do not know any books for these kinds of reads, however, you can look up calculus notes, calculus 2 notes, calculus 3 notes, and differential equations notes online. The ones I use are Paul's Online Notes. He has great explanations of the concepts, clear but not too rigorous proofs, plenty of worked out examples/illustrations, and all of his pdf notes are available online for free. They are categorized by chapter and are very organized. He made the set of notes for the classes he teaches, so they are geared with that in mind.

I would recommend briefly reviewing over his calculus 1 / calculus 2 notes and then moving onward.
 
  • #13
Brian T said:
I would recommend looking into multivariable calculus and differential equations after having a solid understanding of calculus. These will reinforce your understanding of calculus in general. (Definitely multivariable calculus (i.e. calc 3) before doing differential equations).

I do not know any books for these kinds of reads, however, you can look up calculus notes, calculus 2 notes, calculus 3 notes, and differential equations notes online. The ones I use are Paul's Online Notes. He has great explanations of the concepts, clear but not too rigorous proofs, plenty of worked out examples/illustrations, and all of his pdf notes are available online for free. They are categorized by chapter and are very organized. He made the set of notes for the classes he teaches, so they are geared with that in mind.

I would recommend briefly reviewing over his calculus 1 / calculus 2 notes and then moving onward.

I like that Paul's Notes website. Thanks.
 
  • #14
MidgetDwarf said:
Not sure if I can answer this. To understand calculus you have to work from a book like spivak or Apostol. However, as a physics major it may be too much.

I believe Kline book would be to easy for you since you have done calculus 2. The book that gave me a better understanding of calculus was the 3rd ed of thomas calculus with analytic geometry. It is a textbook, however the author explains the why in good fashion. For instance his derivation of the shell method is very easy to follow and understand, where stewart made the the proof look uggly and messy.

Not sure if you are trying to understand the application side of the math in regards to physics. Many people recommend Boas mathematical methods, however since I am a math major I have no knowledge of boas. Lang calculus book goes a bit more into detail, however having seen calculus 2 working through Spivak would be a better idea. But Spivak is more an introductory to analysis book.

Added all those books to my wishlist too. Going to do more research before buying any of them. Thanks for the suggestions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K