Mathematics for Quantum Mechanics/Thermodynamics/Statistical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
For a rising sophomore majoring in microbiology with interests in physics and mathematics, foundational knowledge in calculus (both single and multi-variable), linear algebra, and differential equations is essential for introductory courses in atomic/quantum physics, relativity, thermodynamics, and statistical mechanics. Rigorous proof-based mathematics is not necessary for these introductory levels; a working knowledge is sufficient. While advanced courses may require more theoretical understanding, most physics applications do not demand the level of rigor found in texts like Spivak and Apostol. Familiarity with concepts such as vector spaces, linear operators, and basic probability theory will be beneficial, particularly for quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, but detailed mathematical proofs are not a prerequisite for success in these courses.
bacte2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
47
Hello!

I am a rising sophomore with a major in microbiology. Although my main interest is in the microbiology and biochemistry, I am also deeply fascinated by the atomic/quantum physics, relativity, thermodynamics, and statistical mechanics. I will be taking those courses later on. I wrote this post to ask you what should I know in terms of mathematical subjects for those math-intensive courses; they are introductory courses. Do I need to know the proof-based, theoretical mathematics or am I fine with the computational mathematics? Do I need to know how to do the mathematical proofs for those courses?




MSK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an introductory course, you certainly don't need the rigorous proof based mathematics. You should have a working knowledge of calculus (single and multi-variable), linear algebra, and differential equations. That should be about it.
 
Thank you very much for the response! So I do not need to know the calculus levels of Spivak and Apostol for those introductory courses?
 
Introductory courses require working knowledge. More advanced courses may require some more rigorous knowledge. But at no point in physics do you probably really ever need the total rigor of a mathematician, unless you plan on doing mathematical physics, or applied math. Not to say that it wouldn't help to be rigorous, but most physicists are not so concerned with rigor.

I am not familiar with those books, so I can't comment on their levels.
 
bacte2013 said:
Thank you very much for the response! So I do not need to know the calculus levels of Spivak and Apostol for those introductory courses?

No, definitely not.

For QM, I would advise you to read up on vector spaces, linear operators, inner-product spaces and maybe even dual spaces. This will help a great deal.

A bit of mathematical probability theory will definitely help for Stat Mech since I've seen that Stat Mech books truly botch the job. But you definitely don't need to go in the nitty gritty details.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top