MHB Mathopolis: Transforming Function Qs

  • Thread starter Thread starter caligari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding the transformation of a function into a specific form, particularly the expression (x + 4)² + 2(x + 4). Participants seek clarification on the reasoning behind this transformation compared to the standard quadratic form x² + 2x + 4. There is a specific inquiry about the presence of three instances of (x + 4) in the expression, which leads to further questions about the explanation provided. The conversation highlights a need for clearer understanding of function transformations and their representations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of comprehending mathematical rules and their applications.
caligari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Mathopolis Question Database

I was wondering why this function was this answer and not X^2+2x+4 and why it is in the form that it is. Is it just some rule that you put it in that form? In the answer given, (x + 4)2 + 2(x + 4) , I don't understand how you get 3 different (x+4). Even though the answer is right there and it explains it I still don't get it. X^2+2x+4 makes sense to me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Which question number are you talking about?

caligari said:
In the answer given, (x + 4)2 + 2(x + 4) , I don't understand how you get 3 different (x+4).
Where do you see three different $(x+4)$ in $(x + 4)^2 + 2(x + 4)$?

caligari said:
Even though the answer is right there and it explains it
What exactly explains it?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top