Matrix Determinant with Added Rows: How Does Multiplication Affect Calculation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the determinant of a modified matrix derived from an original matrix A with a known determinant. The original poster presents a matrix formed by linear combinations of its rows and seeks to understand how these operations affect the determinant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply known determinant properties but expresses confusion about the impact of adding scaled rows to the determinant calculation. Some participants suggest using determinant rules to analyze the situation, while others question the steps taken in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the determinant properties and how they apply to the specific matrix transformations presented. There is an ongoing dialogue about the correct application of these properties, with some guidance offered on expanding determinants and recognizing linearity, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to a previous thread that may provide additional context, but the original poster indicates uncertainty about the specific operations affecting the determinant. The discussion includes attempts to clarify the rules without arriving at a definitive solution.

nicknaq
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


matrix A= [v1,v2,v3,v4]^T and detA=4
then what is det [9v1+7v4, v2, v3, 9v4+4v1]^T ?


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that my problem is identical to the problem encountered in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=431395"
However, I don't know how the addition of 7v4 and 4v1 (for rows 1 and 4, respectively) will alter the calculation. I know that adding 4v1 is different than usual because row 1 has been multiplied by 9. Similarly, adding 7v4 is different because row 4 has been multiplied by 9. But what happens first? And how does it affect the det calculation?

Thank you,
Nick
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you multiply one row (or column) of a determinant by a number, the entire determinant is multiplied by that number. If you add a multiple of one row (or column) to another, the determinant stays the same. (If you swap two rows (or columns) you multiply the determinant by -1 but that does not happen here.)
 
I understand the rules. I'm having troubles applying them.

Here's what I gather:
v1 : 9v1+7v4 --> 9v1+7*(4v1+9v4) = 37v1 + 63v4
v4 : 4v1+9v4--> 9v4+4*(9v1+7v4)= 37v4 + 36v1

Thus the det should be 4*37*37. But that is incorrect. Where is my error?
 
yo ur that guy from the warums lol
 
huh?
 
It's the same answer as in the other thread. det[9v1+7v4, v2, v3, 9v4+4v1]=det[9v1,v2,v3,9v4+4v1]+det[7v4,v2,v3,9v4+4v1]. Now expand in the fourth row or column or whatever.
 
Dick said:
It's the same answer as in the other thread. det[9v1+7v4, v2, v3, 9v4+4v1]=det[9v1,v2,v3,9v4+4v1]+det[7v4,v2,v3,9v4+4v1]. Now expand in the fourth row or column or whatever.
sorry but I'm still not getting it.

given those matrices, my det should be (9*9*4)+(9*7*4), no?
 
nicknaq said:
sorry but I'm still not getting it.

given those matrices, my det should be (9*9*4)+(9*7*4), no?

No. If you expand the second two you'll get 4 dets. Two of them will be zero. Two of them will be nonzero. Which ones are nonzero and what's the value of each one?
 
  • #10
Dick said:
No. If you expand the second two you'll get 4 dets. Two of them will be zero. Two of them will be nonzero. Which ones are nonzero and what's the value of each one?

What do you mean by "expand" the second matrix?
 
  • #11
nicknaq said:
What do you mean by "expand" the second matrix?

Determinants are linear. E.g. det(a+b,c,d,e)=det(a,c,d,e)+det(b,c,d,e). That's what I mean by "expand".
 
  • #12
Ugh. I give up.

Thanks for trying. My fault, not yours.
 
  • #13
nicknaq said:
Ugh. I give up.

Thanks for trying. My fault, not yours.

S'ok, but you are giving up on a pretty easy problem, really. If you want to give it another shot did you follow what I did in post 8 given the rule I gave in post 12? If you just want to pack it in, that's ok too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K