Matrix of rotated elements (stiffness matrix)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amaelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of a stiffness matrix when transitioning between two bases using a rotation matrix. The original poster is confused about the inverted signs in the matrix. Responses clarify that transposing the matrix can resolve the sign issues, as transposition flips the signs in orthogonal matrices. Additionally, there is a mention of potential confusion regarding the "original" and "inverse" matrices. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly applying the rotation matrix in this context.
Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Good day All
I have a doubt regarding the derivation of the following matrix
rotated matrix.png

according to my basic understanding we want to go from the basis u1 v1 u2 v2 to the basis u'1 v'1 u'2 v'2, and for doing so we use the rotation matrix

the rotation matrix is the following and the angle theta is positive

rotation matrix.png


but i still can 't understand why the signs are inverted?
any help would be highly appreciated
Many thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • rotated matrix.png
    rotated matrix.png
    24.9 KB · Views: 1,525
  • rotation matrix.png
    rotation matrix.png
    8 KB · Views: 818
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the "stretch k" and some other symbols on here are referring to, but you may consider what happens if you multiply each side by the transpose of your matrix. Transposition 'flips' the negative signs that seem out of place here. The matrix is orthogonal, so you may just be missing which matrix is the "original one" and which one is the inverse.
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle
StoneTemplePython said:
I'm not sure what the "stretch k" and some other symbols on here are referring to, but you may consider what happens if you multiply each side by the transpose of your matrix. Transposition 'flips' the negative signs that seem out of place here. The matrix is orthogonal, so you may just be missing which matrix is the "original one" and which one is the inverse.
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K