Matrix of rotated elements (stiffness matrix)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amaelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Matrix
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 3K views · last reply
Amaelle
Messages
318
Reaction score
55
Good day All
I have a doubt regarding the derivation of the following matrix
Slide titled 1.2 Rotated element showing a bar at angle theta between nodes 1 and 2, with forces F1x', F2x' and displacements u1', u2', and the stiffness matrix [k'] and transformation matrix relating primed and unprimed displacements.

according to my basic understanding we want to go from the basis u1 v1 u2 v2 to the basis u'1 v'1 u'2 v'2, and for doing so we use the rotation matrix

the rotation matrix is the following and the angle theta is positive

Rotation matrix R_alpha equals a 2 by 2 matrix with rows cos(alpha), -sin(alpha) and sin(alpha), cos(alpha).


but i still can 't understand why the signs are inverted?
any help would be highly appreciated
Many thanks in advance!
 
Attachments
  • Slide titled 1.2 Rotated element showing a bar at angle theta between nodes 1 and 2, with forces F1x', F2x' and displacements u1', u2', and the stiffness matrix [k'] and transformation matrix relating primed and unprimed displacements.
    rotated matrix.png
    24.9 KB · Views: 1,604
  • Rotation matrix R_alpha equals a 2 by 2 matrix with rows cos(alpha), -sin(alpha) and sin(alpha), cos(alpha).
    rotation matrix.png
    8 KB · Views: 860
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the "stretch k" and some other symbols on here are referring to, but you may consider what happens if you multiply each side by the transpose of your matrix. Transposition 'flips' the negative signs that seem out of place here. The matrix is orthogonal, so you may just be missing which matrix is the "original one" and which one is the inverse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
StoneTemplePython said:
I'm not sure what the "stretch k" and some other symbols on here are referring to, but you may consider what happens if you multiply each side by the transpose of your matrix. Transposition 'flips' the negative signs that seem out of place here. The matrix is orthogonal, so you may just be missing which matrix is the "original one" and which one is the inverse.
Thanks a lot!