Matrix with repeated eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the values of x that result in the matrix having at least one repeated eigenvalue, specifically an algebraic multiplicity of 2 or greater. The characteristic equation derived from the matrix is (\lambda - 3)((\lambda - x)^2 - 4) = 0. The solutions for x that yield a double root include x = 2 and x = 3. The analysis confirms that the discriminant condition for the second factor does not yield any additional solutions, solidifying the conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials
  • Knowledge of matrix determinants
  • Basic concepts of algebraic and geometric multiplicity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of characteristic polynomials for different matrix types
  • Explore the implications of algebraic versus geometric multiplicity in linear algebra
  • Learn about the significance of discriminants in polynomial equations
  • Investigate the properties of matrices with repeated eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of matrices and eigenvalues.

Shambles
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The question is asking for what values of x will the matrix have at least one repeated eigenvalue (algebraic multiplicity of 2 or greater). The matrix is
| 3 0 0 |
| 0 x 2 | So naturally a normal attempt to find the eigenvalue in a question with only intergers
| 0 2 x | I would continue with:

| [tex]\lambda[/tex]-3 0 0 |
| 0 [tex]\lambda[/tex]-x -2|
| 0 -2 [tex]\lambda[/tex]-x|

And then finding the determinant would continue with ([tex]\lambda[/tex]-3)([tex]\lambda[/tex]-x)([tex]\lambda[/tex]-x) - (-2)(-2)([tex]\lambda[/tex]-3) etc...

Except with 2 unknown variable it inevitably becomes a problem that I run into with more theoretical questions vs questions dealing only with numbers. As far as I know an eigenvalue with an algebraic multiplicity of >1 doesn't even have a geometric significance. Clearly I am approaching this entire question from the wrong angle and could use a push in the right direction if anyone is so able. Muchly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't see why you need to be that theoretical!

The characteristic equation for the eigenvalues is obviously [itex](\lambda- 3)((\lambda- x)^2- 4)= 0. 3 is an obvious solution to that so in order to have a double root, either 3 is a root of [itex](\lambda- x)^2- 4= 0[/itex] or that equation has a double root. If 3 is a root then we must have [itex](3- x)^2- 4= x^2- 6x+ 5= (x- 3)(x- 2)= 0[/itex] so that x= 2 or 3. If [itex](\lambda- x)^2- 4= \lambda^2- 2x\lambda+ x^2- 4= 0[/itex] has a double root, then its discriminant must be 0: [itex]4x^2- 4(x^2- 4)= 4[/itex] is never 0 so that can't happen.[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K