B Where Did All the Matter in the Universe Come From?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter ISamson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    big bang matter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of matter in the universe according to the Big Bang model. Participants clarify that the Big Bang represents a point in time rather than a specific location in space, emphasizing that the universe expanded uniformly from this event. They explain that energy is not conserved in the traditional sense in an expanding universe, as described by General Relativity, which allows for the conversion of energy into matter during cosmic inflation. The initial energy from the Big Bang rapidly transformed into matter and radiation as the universe cooled. This process led to the creation of all known subatomic particles, addressing the original poster's confusion about the formation of matter.
ISamson
Gold Member
Messages
435
Reaction score
150
Hello.
I mean no challenge against current existing theories.
I wanted to ask, how does the Big Bang model explain the creation of all the existing matter in the Universe? I read that the BB created matter but how how could matter be created? I think it should have been either infinitely concentrated in a point, or be just born from something. If it was infinitely concentrated in a point, then where did all that matter come from? It is said that the BB was the beginning of time, so...
I don't understand this.
Were all the subatomic particles that we know of in the Standard Model created at one single point in time, the BB? How did all of them come in existence? How did they form?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
I have seen some threads on similar discussions, but to be honest I did not understand much from them...
Can anyone please help me with my misunderstanding?
Thank you for taking time to consider all these questions!:smile:

P.S. This post is full of questions, but this is a very interesting topic and I am just a middle schooler...:)
 
Space news on Phys.org
I recommend Stephen Weinberg's "The First Three Minutes". It's fairly short and an easy read.

You need to let go of this "everything was at a point" thing. It was a point in TIME, not a point in space. The big bang happened everywhere, not at a point in space. If it had happened at a point in space, it would have been, as pop-sci presentations would have you believe, an "explosion" and there would be a center. There is not. I recommend the link in my signature.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
@phinds but would the universe have to be expanding from a point, the point of the BB?
Thank you for the response.
 
ISamson said:
@phinds but would the universe have to be expanding from a point, the point of the BB?
Thank you for the response.
Yes, a point in TIME, not a point in space.
 
phinds said:
It was a point in TIME, not a point in space.
That's not very clear to novices, since they have been instructed that space and time are indubitably woven into the fabric of... spacetime.

Anyway this must be the millionth time this topic has been raised on here, and will no doubt be locked like all the others. Kudos I suppose to the mods for rehashing the same old 'answers', and not exploding in a veritable fireball of incandescent frustration.
 
ISamson said:
I wanted to ask, how does the Big Bang model explain the creation of all the existing matter in the Universe? I read that the BB created matter but how how could matter be created?
If you want a full description, Phinds' suggestion is a good one. Here's a super short version, in two points:

1. Energy is not conserved in an expanding universe. This is highly counter-intuitive. But it is what General Relativity tells us. General Relativity follows a more complicated conservation law that includes energy, momentum, pressure, and twisting forces. The conservation of this more complicated structure forces energy to change over time following very precise rules based upon the interaction between energy and these other properties (momentum, pressure, twisting forces).
2. Using a particular definition of energy*, in the most common model (cosmic inflation) extremely early universe energy grew extremely rapidly. Then that energy was converted to matter and radiation, and the energy dropped over time very early-on as the universe cooled. But lots of matter that came from that initial energy production remained.

* The particular definition in this case is the "total energy in a finite co-moving volume". It increases at an exceedingly rapid pace during inflation. It decreases when radiation is the dominant energy density.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Back
Top