Matter, antimatter, and durak equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter valdar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Matter
valdar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
matter, antimatter, and Dirac equation

As far as I know the Dirac equation states that there is a copy of this universe somewhere made up of only antimatter. At the same time isn't the lhc being used to find out why normal matter 'won' at the creation of the universe? But at the same time with the Dirac equation we know that antimatter 'won' in the same way in some other universe.

so then how does CP-volation happen? didnt it happen in equal but opposite ways for the matter universe and the antimatter universe?

what if were the antimatter universe actually?

Edit: typos
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are calling Dirac durak, it's not funny.
 
humanino said:
If you are calling Dirac durak, it's not funny.

Typo - its fixed now
 


valdar said:
As far as I know the Dirac equation states that there is a copy of this universe somewhere made up of only antimatter. At the same time isn't the lhc being used to find out why normal matter 'won' at the creation of the universe? But at the same time with the Dirac equation we know that antimatter 'won' in the same way in some other universe.

so then how does CP-volation happen? didnt it happen in equal but opposite ways for the matter universe and the antimatter universe?

what if were the antimatter universe actually?

Edit: typos

A good book on the subject is "Antimatter" by Frank Close of Oxford. It's not a difficult read.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top