Max. sound wave frequency (in solids)?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the maximum frequency of sound waves in solids, particularly in relation to theoretical and practical limits, the influence of material properties, and the behavior of sound waves in different media. It encompasses theoretical concepts, practical implications, and the effects of material imperfections on sound propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that while theoretically ultrasound has no upper limit, practical maximum frequencies may exist, potentially influenced by factors such as mean free path and material density.
  • Others mention that theoretical limits are related to lattice spacing and suggest looking into "phonon dispersion" for further details.
  • A participant notes the existence of a minimum possible wavelength, linked to atomic separation, and questions whether smaller wavelengths experience more attenuation due to material imperfections.
  • Another participant argues that shorter wavelengths can be mapped onto longer wavelengths due to lattice periodicity, suggesting that attenuation is not necessarily increased by smaller wavelengths in ideal crystals.
  • There is a discussion about the transfer of sound waves from ideal crystals to less ideal materials, raising the question of whether longer wavelengths are less susceptible to disturbances.
  • One participant clarifies that in continuous media, there is no minimum wavelength, and that attenuation depends on the quality of the material and wavelength, noting a tendency for attenuation to increase with frequency in common media.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the effects of wavelength and material properties on sound propagation, with no consensus reached on the implications of these factors.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on idealized concepts of crystals versus continuous media, and the unresolved nature of how various factors interact with sound wave propagation.

NBerg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I know, theoretically ultrasound has no upper limit (everything above 20kHz).. However, I was wondering whether on a practical note a maximum exists? I read somewhere that frequencies of the order 10^12 Hz were reached. Would a maximum frequency be based on the mean free path between the particles of a matter? Is there a direct relation with material density, i.e. more dense - smaller wavelength possible - higher frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are theoretical limits too. They are indeed related to the lattice spacing.
You can look up "phonon dispersion" for more details.
The sound waves will be associated with the so called "acoustic modes" of phonons.
 
Alrigh, that is good information! Thanks,

I also found this:
"There is a minimum possible wavelength, given by twice the equilibrium separation a between atoms. As we shall see in the following sections, any wavelength shorter than this can be mapped onto a wavelength longer than 2a, due to the periodicity of the lattice."

I imagine smaller wavelengths suffer from more attenuation from material imperfections and grain boundaries, etc?!
 
NBerg said:
Alrigh, that is good information! Thanks,

I also found this:
"There is a minimum possible wavelength, given by twice the equilibrium separation a between atoms. As we shall see in the following sections, any wavelength shorter than this can be mapped onto a wavelength longer than 2a, due to the periodicity of the lattice."

I imagine smaller wavelengths suffer from more attenuation from material imperfections and grain boundaries, etc?!
Not really. As you quote says, shorter wavelengths are physically identical with some longer wavelength. That means the configuration of the system will look the same. You may find a graphical illustration of this in the book you are using.
It is a property of a pure ideal crystal. Nothing to do with imperfections or impurities.
 
Well yeah, a single crystal would be ideal for sound propagation. But what if these crystal-generated waves are transferred to other, less ideal materials?
The quote says 2a is the smallest wavelength possible. Larger wavelength (modes) do exist though. Aren't those less susceptible to disturbances? It's frequently said that low pitch sounds travel further than high pitch ones right?
 
OK, now you are talking about a somehow different aspect.
The minimum wavelength is due to the discrete (atomic) nature of crystals. In a continuous medium (this is an ideal concept) there will be no minimum wavelength.

The attenuation of waves (of any kind) depends on the quality of the crystal, defects, impurities, etc. The effect of each factor depends on wavelength.
For ultrasound there is indeed a tendency for attenuation to increase with frequency, at least for many common media (water, metals, biological tissues, plastics).
 
In the http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/DebyeTheory.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, thanks for the clear explanations! This was very helpful! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K