Max Velocity Below c When Falling from Infinity to Black Hole?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Austin0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freefall Infinity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the maximum possible coordinate velocity of a mass falling from infinity towards a maximally massive black hole, particularly in relation to the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of gravitational effects on velocity and time dilation, as well as the behavior of free-falling objects both outside and inside the event horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that there is a maximum coordinate velocity below the speed of light (c) for a mass falling from infinity, with the local velocity approaching c as the object nears the event horizon.
  • Others argue that while the local velocity can get arbitrarily close to c, it can never actually reach c due to the nature of observers and the event horizon.
  • A participant provides a formula for the local velocity of a free-falling object, indicating that it is dependent on the Schwarzschild radius and the radial distance from the black hole.
  • There is a discussion about the time dilation factor for a stationary observer at infinity, with some suggesting it never reaches unity in practice.
  • Questions are raised regarding the velocity profile of free-falling objects inside the event horizon, with a note that there are no stationary observers in that region, complicating the definition of velocity.
  • One participant mentions that gravitational fields can decelerate objects above certain velocities, which challenges common intuitions about gravity's effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the maximum coordinate velocity or the implications of gravitational effects on velocity. Multiple competing views remain regarding the behavior of objects near and inside the event horizon.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of velocity and the challenges of discussing velocities inside the event horizon where traditional concepts may not apply. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps related to the velocity profiles.

Austin0
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
1
Assuming a system with relatively small but non-negligable mass falling from infinity to a maximally massive black hole;
Would there be a maximum possible coordinate velocity below c ?
Is it possible to do an approximate calculation for this?
A ballpark figure??
If there is a limit, what is the physics behind it?

A related question : Is there a minimal dilation factor for the clock of a Schwarzschild observer at infinity, independent of the mass of the gravitating body?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Austin0 said:
Assuming a system with relatively small but non-negligable mass falling from infinity to a maximally massive black hole;
Would there be a maximum possible coordinate velocity below c ?
Is it possible to do an approximate calculation for this?
A ballpark figure??
If there is a limit, what is the physics behind it?

A related question : Is there a minimal dilation factor for the clock of a Schwarzschild observer at infinity, independent of the mass of the gravitating body?

Thanks

The local velocity of a free falling object as measured by a stationary observer at r for an object that is initially at rest and released from infinity is:

[tex]v= c \sqrt{\frac{Rs}{r}}[/tex]

For an observer very close to the event horizon so that r is nearly equal to Rs, the local velocity approaches c. The catch is that we can not have a (*stationary*) observer exactly at (*or below*) the event horizon (r=Rs) so the velocity is never exactly c but we can take the observer as close as we like to the event horizon and the maximum velocity to as close as we like to c as long as the difference we are satisfied with is not exactly zero.

So you can have the maximum velocity as 0.99c or 0.9999999999999999c or as many 9's after the decimal point as you like, but you can't have v=c.The time dilation factor of a stationary clock in the Schwarzschild metric is [itex]d\tau = dt\sqrt{(1-Rs/r)}[/itex]. If you move away from the gravitational source so that r tends towards infinite, then the time dilation factor tends to unity, but since in practice you probably never arrive "exactly" at infinity, the time dilation factor of the "distant clock" is probably never exactly unity, but you take as close to unity as you like. :wink:
 
Last edited:
What is the velocity profile of a free falling object inside the event horizon?
 
yuiop said:
The local velocity of a free falling object as measured by a stationary observer at r for an object that is initially at rest and released from infinity is:

[tex]v= c \sqrt{\frac{Rs}{r}}[/tex]

For an observer very close to the event horizon so that r is nearly equal to Rs, the local velocity approaches c. The catch is that we can not have an observer exactly at the event horizon (r=Rs) so the velocity is never exactly c but we can take the observer as close as we like to the event horizon and the maximum velocity to as close as we like to c as long as the difference we are satisfied with is not exactly zero.
I fully agree with yuiop here.

Since you asked about the coordinate velocity falling from infinity I will add this here.

The formula is:

[tex] \sqrt { \left( 1- \left( 1-{{\it v0}}^{2} \right) \left( 1-{\frac {{<br /> \it rs}}{r}} \right) \right) \left( 1-{\frac {{\it rs}}{r}} \right) <br /> ^{2}}[/tex]

v0 is the initial speed at infinity, rs is the Schwarzschild radius.

The coordinate velocity does not have a maximum but this is a good opportunity to address a misunderstanding that many people have. A gravitational field does not necessarily accelerate an object towards the center of gravity. In fact above a certain velocity gravitation decelerates it, by the way, just like in the case of light.

See the attached graph for the coordinate velocity of 3 different scenarios (initial velocity=0, 1/sqrt(2) and 1/sqrt(3) ), you can see what I am saying.

Now you mention that the object in question has mass, for simplicity I assume you mean that in that case the object does not have to travel at c (by the way the formula I wrote above also works for c). If not then the problem becomes a lot more complex. Is that what you want to discuss?

skeptic2 said:
What is the velocity profile of a free falling object inside the event horizon?
For coordinate velocity it is the same formula, I added a graph for that case as well (initial velocity=0, 1/sqrt(2) and 1/sqrt(3) ). You can determine it all the way up to, but not including R=0.

In addition we can also calculate the proper velocity (d proper length/d tau), a third graph (initial velocity=0, 1/sqrt(2) and 1/sqrt(3) ) will show this relationship, the formula is:

[tex] \sqrt {1- \left( 1-{{\it v0}}^{2} \right) \left( 1-{\frac {{\it rs}}{<br /> r}} \right) }[/tex]
 

Attachments

  • Falling from Infinity.jpg
    Falling from Infinity.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 436
  • Falling from Infinity 2.jpg
    Falling from Infinity 2.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 398
  • Falling from Infinity 3.jpg
    Falling from Infinity 3.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 426
Last edited:
skeptic2 said:
What is the velocity profile of a free falling object inside the event horizon?
There are no stationary observers inside the horizon, so you can't define something like an absolute velocity.
yuiop's formula is also valid inside the horizon, if you redefine it to mean [itex]dr/d\tau[/itex], radial coordinate distance / proper time. That's not a velocity, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
628
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K