Maximization of motor speed/torque

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing the design of a vehicle for a competition, focusing on maximizing motor speed and torque while adhering to specific power constraints. Participants explore various electrical components, motor types, and battery options to enhance performance in terms of speed, precision, and control.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests considering brushless DC motors for higher RPM and precision, while questioning the feasibility of using stepper motors for similar speeds.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of defining battery specifications before selecting motors, noting that some batteries can deliver high current.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of the battery types allowed in the competition, with one participant seeking recommendations for high mA-hr batteries that are reasonably priced.
  • Participants discuss the trade-offs between brushed and stepper motors, highlighting that stepper motors provide better torque at low speeds but require more complex control.
  • One participant raises questions about the vehicle's speed requirements, weight, and precision, suggesting that brushed motors may suffice for less stringent precision needs.
  • Suggestions for sourcing motors and batteries include looking into RC model motors and various online retailers.
  • Concerns are raised about the vehicle's design, particularly regarding weight distribution, wheel size, and material, which may affect traction and performance.
  • One participant mentions the potential for using lithium polymer (LiPo) batteries but notes a specific battery's voltage exceeds competition limits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various opinions on motor types and battery options, with no clear consensus on the best approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal configuration for the vehicle.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to battery specifications and competition rules, as well as the need for careful consideration of vehicle design elements that affect performance.

rkum99
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
For an upcoming competition, I must construct a vehicle that is capable of traveling at high speeds and can travel precise predetermined distances. While any electrical components may be used, any and all circuitry can only be powered by a single 9V battery.

I am currently using a rather rudimentary set-up: 2 DC motors controlled by an Arduino microcontroller, powered in parallel by a 9V duracell battery. I was wondering if any of you guys had any ideas on how I could improve such a system in terms of circuitry/electrical components.

Some ideas:

Better battery - Other battery types may allow me to draw higher current and thus greater power. Any suggestions on specific types?

Better motors - A DC motor isn't incredibly fast not precise. I was considering a brushless DC motor simply because they provide very high rpm - can stepper motors provide similar high speeds along with their inherent high precision? A vast majority of brushless motors available on the internet don't seem to come at 9V - would it be worth it to step up the voltage to use higher voltage motors, despite the loss in power?

Any other suggestions? I am not the most familiar with circuitry, so I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would look at brushless/http://www.geckodrive.com/gecko/images/cms_files/Step%20Motor%20Basics%20Guide.pdf. They have good torque. Also they can back up if needed to make your end mark. They can be geared if you need lots of RPMs, but I read 1000s RPMs is not unreasonable for an ungeared stepper. That seems excessive for wheels to me, but I don't know your application.

They do require more programming and design work.
 
Are there any limits on the battery? Some can deliver 100+ amps so I would be surprised if there weren't some other limits on what you can use in the rules. You need to define the battery before you look for a motor.
 
Well, the only limit I have on the battery is its price, haha. As defined in the rules:
"The vehicle may use no more than 6 individual cells (labelled 1.5V or less each), a single 9V battery, or a single batery pack (labeled 7.2 V or less) during the run time"
What would be the highest mA-hr battery (also reasonably priced) I could get that is commercially sold?

To control the motors, I am currently using an arduino microcontroller with an adafruit motor shield. Unfortunately, the motor shield cannot be used to control brushless motors (but can control stepper motors, which I always though were a subset of brushless DC motors). Anyway, my options are reduced to brushed motors and stepper motors.

I think my biggest problem I'm facing in this project is actually finding the parts I need. I will most likely purchase one of the brushed DC motors from this website:
http://www.maxonmotorusa.com/maxon/view/content/products - are there any other suggestions for good motor suppliers?

Any recommended motors in the following list?
http://www.maxonmotorusa.com/maxon/...duct_index&target=filter&filterCategory=remax

I appreciate any help.
 
How fast is fast? How long does it need to run? how heavy is the whole thing?

How precisely do you need to move?... if you need to move within a couple mm's, a brushed motor will do very well, if you want to move within a 1/10th of a mm, you may be better off with a stepper. The nice thing about a brushed DC motor is it's pretty simple to control. Benefit to a stepper is they have the best torque at low speeds, which makes them good candidates to direct drive the wheels, saving on gearing. I have a stepper motor controller powered by a STmicro 6470 chip over SPI interface.. it's made by Phi Robotics (got it through robotshop)

For a battery, I'd check out cordless drill /screwdriver batteries... Buy a cordless drill (it might even be handy to build the project), then use the battery to power it.. Even an old laptop battery will have 4V Lithium cells, and a few of them will probably still be good.
If you really want to go for broke, you might find 6V lead/acid batteries for motorcycle use, they aren't exaggeratedly big and pack pretty good power.

You might want to check out www.robotshop.com for steppers, www.sparkfun.com for controllers... I get a lot of stuff on Amazon, and of course Ebay... Adafruit may have something as well.
 
So my goal is to try and move the vehicle across 8 m in less than 2 seconds, but less than 3 seconds is acceptable as well. The vehicle must then stop at some designated point after the 8 m, to a precision of less that 1 cm.

To control the motors, I'm using the adafruit motor shield, which simplifies the process considerably. The program I am currently using runs the motors at max speed for the initial 8 meters, then slow down considerably and crawls up to the designated stopping line. Another program I have has the vehicle run at full speed past the stop line and stop at 12 meters - then it moves in reverse back to the stop line at a very slow speed.
 
rkum99 said:
Well, the only limit I have on the battery is its price, haha. As defined in the rules:
"The vehicle may use no more than 6 individual cells (labelled 1.5V or less each), a single 9V battery, or a single batery pack (labeled 7.2 V or less) during the run time"

Some Lipo packs are rated at 7.4V 4800mAH and 90C for short bursts..

http://www.overlander.co.uk/batteries/car-buggy-batteries/lipo-batteries-4800mah-2s-7-4v-90c-extreme-track-shorty.html

However that battery can probably deliver way more power than your wheels can (without them just spinning like crazy). I think it would be worth contacting a model car racing club to seek advice on how to maximise traction on the competition floor surface.

If the run time only has to be <10 seconds then then the mHA rating is almost irrelevant - except that the max current they will deliver is usually higher for larger capacity cells than smaller ones.

I think weight will also be a factor - it's one thing to accelerate as fast as possible but you also have to slow down and stop without skidding out of the room. I'm thinking you probably don't want a massive battery, just one that is light but which can still deliver reasonably high current?

PS The battery pack above is marked 7.4V not 7.2V so wouldn't be allowed. That's because it's a Lipo pack. You may have to choose between a lower voltage lipo or a NiMH pack.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and Rx7man
You've really started in the wrong place in the design of your vehicle .

More than adequate batteries and motors can probably be found easy enough . Your problem is in getting max available power through the wheels without slip and making vehicle run in a straight line .

So consider things like :

(1) Basic layout of vehicle components and weight distribution .

(2) Wheel size , tyre material and steering arrangement .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #10
As of now, my actual vehicle layout is somewhat set in stone, but if you have any suggestions, those are appreciated as well.

I am currently using a 9'' by 5'' aluminum sheet to mount all the parts. I am using Banebots wheels with 2-7/8'' inch diameter as seen in the following link:
http://www.banebots.com/product/T40P-293BG-HS4.html

The two motors used to drive the vehicle will be placed in the very front of the aluminum sheet, with two unpowered wheels in the rear. Any other components (microcontroller, battery, etc.) will be placed roughly along the middle so the center of mass is still in the center of the vehicle. With my current setup, using 4 DC motors, a microcontroller, and a duracell 9V battery, the total weight of the vehicle is around 500 g.

I should also mention that skidding shouldn't be as much of an issue. I plan on slowing down gradually well before the actual stop line - the vehicle will then move forwards slowly and stop. Since the speed only matters during the initial 8 meters, whatever happens after that isn't important, so long as it stops at the stop line.
 
  • #11
Well, we got to figure out the minimum acceleration.. Now if the stop line requires you to start slowing down before the 8m mark, you'll have to increase the acceleration, but for now let's not bother with that
So x = ½a(Δt)2
x = 8, Δt = 3
a = 16/9 or roughly 3m/s2
Max speed will be about 9m/s (3m/s^2 for 3 seconds)... If you can accelerate faster you can reduce the top speed

Minimum coefficient of friction will be 3/9.8 or about .3, which should be fairly easy to achieve, though driving the rear wheels would greatly help!

Now you say you have 2 7/8"(0.0365m radius) wheels, or 0.23m circumference, at 9m/s that's 40 r/s, or 2400 RPM.
I'm going to go with this motor for calculations... since you're already dealing with them it seems
http://www.banebots.com/product/M3-RS380-72.html
7.3V, 16000RPM no load speed, peak efficiency at 13000 RPM, stall torque = 11 in/lb, peak efficiency torque = 2in/lb..
so you'll need to gear it down 13000/2400 or about 5.5:1... Banebots has a 5:1 gearbox to fit that motor... let's go with it.. for a 5:1 reduction you could maybe get a more affordable solution with a belt drive?
http://www.banebots.com/product/P60S-5-3.html

Lets go with a middle-of-the-road torque of 7in/lb (.8nm), multiplied by 5 for the reduction gear puts it at 4nm torque at the wheel
Work it out to actual force, torque/radius = 4/.0365 = 110n

I'm going to be generous with the weight and double it for 1 kg total, or .25kg per wheel.. which means a force of 2.5N

I don't have to do much math with the coefficient of friction to see that this motor will burn rubber if it's capable of 110N of driving force with only 2.5N of downforce.. It actually looks like you could direct drive it, and even just use one motor, unless steering is done by driving one side more than the other.
 
  • #12
rkum99 said:
8 m in less than 2 seconds, but less than 3 seconds is acceptable as well. The vehicle must then stop at some designated point after the 8 m, to a precision of less that 1 cm.

To achieve that precision in distance, 1cm out of 8meters, 0.125%
will you count wheel turns? Are you allowed to place a target at the destination?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K