Maximize Vol. of Cylinder w/ Conical End: Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on maximizing the volume of a projectile shaped as a circular cylinder with a conical end, given a fixed surface area. Key equations include the surface area formula SA = πr² + 2πrl + πrs and the volume formula V = πr²l + (1/3)πr²s sin(θ). Participants explored methods such as Lagrange multipliers and partial derivatives but encountered challenges due to the interdependence of variables. The solution involves using the relationship s sin(θ) = √(s² - r²) to derive optimal proportions for r, s, and l.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically Lagrange multipliers and partial derivatives.
  • Familiarity with geometric formulas for volume and surface area of solids.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric relationships in geometric contexts.
  • Ability to manipulate and solve algebraic equations involving multiple variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in optimization problems.
  • Learn about geometric properties of cylinders and cones, focusing on volume and surface area calculations.
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their applications in geometric optimization.
  • Investigate parameter-based approaches in optimization to understand how constants affect solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working on optimization problems involving geometric shapes and require a deeper understanding of volume maximization techniques.

jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Maximizing an Object

Homework Statement


What proportions will maximize the volume of a projectile in the form of a circular cylinder with one conical end and one flat end, if the surface area is given?

(there is a picture given with r being the radius, l being the length of the cylinder and s being the length of the cone(outside edge))

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I can come up with:
SA = \pi*r^2+ 2\pi*rl + \pi*rs
V = \pi*r^2l + \pi / 3r^2*s*sin\theta

I've tried both using Lagrange multipliers and just using partial derivatives.
but haven't really come up with anything...
(r, l, s)
<2\pi rl + 2/3\pi*r*s*sin\theta, \pi r^2 + 0, 1/3\pi*r^2*sin\theta> = \lambda*(<2\pi r + 2\pi l + \pi s, 2\pi r, \pi r>
Then with using the 3 equations I was getting r = 2l and l = lamda, which isn't the case, so I think I must either need another equation or my equations are wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is wrong here is that sin(theta) is NOT independent of s and r!
Hence, you cannot treat it as a constant.


Use therefore the relationship: s\sin\theta=\sqrt{s^{2}-r^{2}} in your volume formula.
 
Thanks for your reply, I am able to get a few relationships between s, r, l, but I can't seem to get the answer yet. (ie r = sqrt(5), s = 3)
I can get
\sqrt{s^2-r^2} = \frac{2}{3} s
r = \sqrt{5} / 3 s
\lambda = r/2
Will my lambda need to change throughout the problem? I seem to consistently be getting the same one, but for whatever reason I can't seem to solve the damn thing.
 
Last edited:
jesuslovesu said:
Thanks for your reply, I am able to get a few relationships between s, r, l, but I can't seem to get the answer yet. (ie r = sqrt(5), s = 3)
I can get
\sqrt{s^2-r^2} = \frac{2}{3} s
r = \sqrt{5} / 3 s
\lambda = 2/r
Will my lambda need to change throughout the problem? I seem to consistently be getting the same one, but for whatever reason I can't seem to solve the damn thing.

I don't get what you are saying.

You have FOUR equations given:
The three "gradient" equations, along with the requirement that the surface area equals some constant C.

Your optimal values of r, s and l (and lambda) will depend upon that C as a parameter.
 
My apologies, the book I'm using put the answer in terms of a ratio, I was thinking it was an actual numerical answer.
 
jesuslovesu said:
My apologies, the book I'm using put the answer in terms of a ratio, I was thinking it was an actual numerical answer.

Well, a known ratio is an actual numerical answer, it just shows that there are several combinations that maximizes the volume of the object
in question.
It is directly related to the parameter-based approach I'd prefer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
603