Maximizing Flow Rate in a Water Pipe: Accounting for Pipe Losses

  • Context: Archived 
  • Thread starter Thread starter soronemus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Max Pipe
soronemus
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the maximum flow rate that can be seen in a water pipe where city water is supplied to a building. The pressure behind the water is 50psi, and the inner diameter of the pipe is 2".


Homework Equations


bernoulli's principle


The Attempt at a Solution



I am more over verifying that my process is correct in solving this. I assumed no pipe losses. I used the bernoulli equation. The first point of the bernoulli equation I estimated as the surface of a pond, ocean, or some infinite water source where v=0 (the water elevation does not change) to cancel out the velocity term for point 1. The pressure on top of the surface is 50psi.

The elevation for both points I assumed to be equal, which cancels out all terms for point 1 other than P/density.

For point 2 I used the exit of the pipe where the fed water is first exposed to the atmosphere (p=0). Since the elevation is the same this leaves only the following equation:

Pressure_1/density=V_2^2/2
V=Q/A
therefore
Pressure/density=(Q/A)^2/2
The only unknown in this equation is Q, so it can be solved for.

My question is: is this a valid solution if I am ignoring pipe losses?
 
on Phys.org
In a pipe of constant cross section, a pressure difference between the ends implies a force difference, yet the flow rate must be constant. This proves the question is all about viscous drag and Bernoulli does not help.
 
You can't use Bernoulli, and I will show you why:

Create a balance between the ends of the pipes, 1 designating the front of the pipe and 2 designating the end.

You will have:
P1,T1,V1,rho1,Z1 and P2,T2,V2,rho2,Z2

You know that the temperature, density, and elevation are constant, so T2=T1, rho1=rho2 and Z2=Z1.

You can now apply the Bernoulli equation.

(P2-P1) - rho/2 (V2^2 - V1^2) + hl = 0

Immediately we have a problem. While we do know P2 - P1, we don't know V2 or V1. Additionally, if we wish to apply the Darcy friction/loss formulas (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darcy–Weisbach_equation) we do not know the length of the pipe or the operating Reynolds number, so we can't use these equations.

My recommendation:
Assume the flow is laminar. You know there is a certain velocity profile from laminar flow. From here you can calculate the flow rate using Q = V*A where V is the average velocity and A is the cross sectional area. You can do this if the flow is turbulent too, but you have to make some additional assumptions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K