Maximizing Non-Linear Functions with Lagrange Multipliers

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Set
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I am working on a paper for a class, and I've come to somewhat of a block. I'll keep the question general.

If I have three non-linear real valued functions,

(1) [tex]f_1(x)[/tex]
(2) [tex]f_2(x,W,H)[/tex]
(3) [tex]f_3(x,W,H)[/tex]

that form a function:

[tex]F(x,W,H) = f_1 + f_2 + f_3[/tex]

How would I maximize [tex]F(x,W,H)[/tex].

Lagrange multipliers are ringing a bell... but before I get too invested in an idea, I would like the proper road to travel down. So If someone could point me in the right direction that would be awesome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are f1,f2,f3 convex?
 
LeBrad said:
Are f1,f2,f3 convex?

I am not actually sure. They are mixed with a lot of different terms (sinh, cosh, ...), so it is hard (for me at least) to get an idea of what they look like.
 
HallsofIvy said:
ARE W and H variables or are they constants? I see no reason to use "Lagrange multipliers" because you have no constraints.

I've recently found out that W corresponds to some constants in the functions, so I can no longer vary it.

So I will have the following:

f(x,W) = const = f1(x)+f2(x,H)+f3(x,H)

x and W both represent the length of a device. I am trying to find lengths that that maximize f(x,W), which actually represent a current.
 
Thanks for the help everyone.

The expressions were too complicated to take derivatives of and solve in such a way (too time consuming at least). I ended up writing a brute force algorithm to try all possible values (from a pool of "intelligent" guesses) to maximize the function.

I appreciate the help.