Maximizing volume of a box without lagrange multipliers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that the largest rectangular box with a fixed surface area must be a cube. The context is rooted in optimization within the subject area of calculus, specifically focusing on volume and surface area relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to solving the problem without using Lagrange multipliers, including manipulating equations for surface area and volume. There are attempts to derive critical points through derivatives and Jacobians, while some participants express uncertainty about the complexity of their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing advice and confirming observations about the problem's structure. Some have shared their progress and insights, while others have raised questions about the correctness of their mathematical expressions and the implications of the problem constraints.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they have not yet learned Lagrange multipliers, which is a significant constraint in their approach. There is also mention of the potential simplicity of a related problem involving minimizing surface area for a given volume, suggesting a connection between the two optimization scenarios.

MuIotaTau
Messages
82
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Show that the largest rectangular box having a fixed surface area must be a cube.

Homework Equations



##V(x,y,z) = xyz##
##\sigma(x,y,z) = 2(xy + yz + zx) = C \in \mathbf{R}##

The Attempt at a Solution



As of this assignment, we haven't yet learned Lagrange multipliers, so that's out of the question. I solved ##\sigma## for ##z##, giving $$z(x,y) = \frac{C - 2xy}{2x + 2y}$$ Substituting in for ##z## in ##V##, I get $$V(x,y) = \frac{Cxy - 2x^2 y^2}{2x + 2y}$$ Taking the Jacobian gives a row matrix whose elements are ##\frac{Cy - 4xy^2}{2x + 2y} + \frac{4x^2y^y - 2Cxy}{(2x + 2y)^2}## and ##\frac{Cy - 4x^2y}{2x + 2y} + \frac{4x^2y^y - 2Cxy}{(2x + 2y)^2}## If I were to proceed, I would set these equal to zero, find the critical points, and use the Hessian, but I feel as if I'm proceeding incorrectly due to the complexity of the derivatives and the presence of ##C##. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is any shortcut. In your equation for ##\sigma## you could divide both sides by ##2## using a new constant. Also you can combine the fractions in your derivatives. I presume those ##y^y## factors are typos. I didn't work it all out but my advice is to plug and chug.

If nothing else, it will give you an appreciation for LaGrange multipliers. Could be that is the point of the exercise at this stage of your studies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yeah, those should have been ##y^2## in both cases. I can definitely see that, given how much they stressed that we not use Lagrange multipliers here. Thank you for the confirmation!
 
Just as an update, after two and a half pages of scratch work, plugging and chugging did in fact work out.

Thank god for Lagrange multipliers.
 
MuIotaTau said:

Homework Statement



Show that the largest rectangular box having a fixed surface area must be a cube.

Homework Equations



##V(x,y,z) = xyz##
##\sigma(x,y,z) = 2(xy + yz + zx) = C \in \mathbf{R}##

The Attempt at a Solution



As of this assignment, we haven't yet learned Lagrange multipliers, so that's out of the question. I solved ##\sigma## for ##z##, giving $$z(x,y) = \frac{C - 2xy}{2x + 2y}$$ Substituting in for ##z## in ##V##, I get $$V(x,y) = \frac{Cxy - 2x^2 y^2}{2x + 2y}$$ Taking the Jacobian gives a row matrix whose elements are ##\frac{Cy - 4xy^2}{2x + 2y} + \frac{4x^2y^y - 2Cxy}{(2x + 2y)^2}## and ##\frac{Cy - 4x^2y}{2x + 2y} + \frac{4x^2y^y - 2Cxy}{(2x + 2y)^2}## If I were to proceed, I would set these equal to zero, find the critical points, and use the Hessian, but I feel as if I'm proceeding incorrectly due to the complexity of the derivatives and the presence of ##C##. Any advice?

Just as a matter of interest: it is much, much simpler to solve the problem of minimizing surface area, subject to a given value of volume. In the fixed-volume problem you have z = V/(x*y), for example, and putting that into σ(x,y,z) yields s quite simple minimization problem. You might then think about whether the fixed-volume, minimum area and fixed-area, maximum volume problems are essentially the same.
 
z is function of x and y: ##z(x,y)=\frac{C-2xy}{2x+2y}##

So the derivatives of V=xyz can be written as

##\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}=yz+xy\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}##

##\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}=xz+xy\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}##

with

##\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=-\frac{y^2+C/2}{(x+y)^2}##
##\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=-\frac{x^2+C/2}{(x+y)^2}##

and both partials of V should be zero: ##yz=-xy\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}## *
##xz=-xy\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}## **

divide eq *- with eq ** and simplify.

ehild
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K