Maximum AC Frequency in a Super Conductor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of alternating current (AC) in superconductors, particularly focusing on whether there is a critical AC frequency and how AC compares to direct current (DC) in superconducting materials. Participants explore theoretical limits, practical applications, and the implications of frequency on superconducting behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a critical AC frequency for superconductors, noting the existence of critical current density and critical field.
  • Another participant questions whether AC can persist indefinitely in superconductors, similar to DC currents.
  • It is suggested that AC skin depth decreases with lower resistance and higher frequency, potentially negating the advantages of superconductors.
  • A participant shares experimental measurements of inductance in superconducting magnets, indicating that DC currents can persist while AC cannot.
  • Discussion includes the theoretical frequency limit for superconductors, linked to the gap energy and Planck's constant, with specific reference to niobium and its implications for astronomical detectors.
  • Participants mention the use of gallium arsenide FET amplifiers in low noise applications and their relation to superconducting mixers.
  • There is a clarification regarding the role of semiconductors and superconductors in amplifiers, with some confusion expressed about their properties and applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of AC in superconductors, with some asserting that AC does not persist like DC, while others explore the theoretical limits and practical applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the critical AC frequency and the comparative advantages of superconductors versus normal conductors at high frequencies.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific frequency ranges and materials, indicating that the discussion is limited by the assumptions made about superconducting behavior and the definitions of terms like "persistence" in the context of AC and DC currents.

BrianConlee
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Maybe one day I'll be able to answer questions instead of ask them...


Is there a critical ac frequency for a super conductor?


I know there's a critical current density and critical field, but assume we stay below those levels.


Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I figure I might as well ask this question on this post too:

Will ac persist 'forever' in a superconductor like dc will?
 
I think AC skin depth reduces with lower conductor resistance (and increasing frequency) so in theory with near zero resistance you get near zero skin depth and therefore the gain by using a superconductor is largely wiped out.
 
Pumblechook is correct. I have measured the inductance of some large superconducting magnets as they were cooling down and warming up, using ac frequencies between 10 Hz and 1000 Hz. In these magnets, the inductance rather quickly increased about 10% (from 40 millihenrys to 44 millihenrys) as the magnets warmed up between 8 kelvin and 10 kelvin. 44 millihenrys was the room temperature value. The missing 4 millihenrys represented the integral of B H over the coil volume.

The DC currents in a SHORTED superconducting magnets will "persist" like in MRI magnets. The only persistent currents in superconducting magnets are DC currents. AC will not work.
 
Last edited:
Good normal conductors tend to be better than superconductors for passive devices like antennas etc above about 100 GHz, but this partly for practical reasons related to fabrication.

The theoretical limit is simply the frequency corresponding to two times the gap energy divided by Planck's constant; for e.g. niobium this is about 700 GHz. Photons with an energy higher than that will simply break a Cooper pair into two electrons meaning the material starts to behave like a normal conductor.
This is one of the main reasons why it is so hard to make astronmical detectors (mixers etc) that work above about 900 GHz.
 
f95toli said:
This is one of the main reasons why it is so hard to make astronmical detectors (mixers etc) that work above about 900 GHz.

In a project about 25 years ago, I used GAsFET (gallium arsenide FET) amplifiers cooled to about 10 kelvin for very low noise operation in the 2 - 4 GHz band.
 
Yes, similar amplifiers are used to amplify the down-mixed signal from superconducting mixers (I use a 4-8 GHz InP HEMT amplifer operated at 1K in my lab, but for a different application).
You can easily find HEMT amplifiers that operate up to 110GHz, but above that frequency you need to use a mixer.
The nice thing with superconducting mixers is that you can actually get a net IF gain from the mixer itself; although I don't think that works in practice in the frequency range we are talking about here.
 
I didn't know semiconductors could also be superconductors??

I though the purpose of cooling amplifieres was to reduce noise.. Nothing to do with superconductors ?

Semiconductors conduct more when hot.
 
Sorry, what I (and presumably Bob S) meant was that HEMT amplifiers (semiconducting) are often used to amplify the signal (i.e. the IF from a mixer) coming from a superconducting device.
I.e. in most applications one tend to use a combination of superconducting and semiconducting devices, occasionally even on the same chip. I guess we were slightly OT.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K