I Maximum Angle of Deflection for Colliding Particles

AI Thread Summary
In collisions between a heavier mass and a lighter one, the maximum angle of deflection is theoretically defined by the equation sin(θ_d_max) = m/M, where m is the mass of the lighter particle and M is the mass of the heavier one. The discussion raises questions about the physical mechanisms that dictate this maximum angle and the transition from grazing to non-grazing collisions. It highlights that the momentum in the center of mass system is equal and opposite, but the velocities differ, with the incoming mass influencing the center of mass velocity and limiting the scattering angle. The inquiry seeks a clearer understanding of the physical conditions that occur at the maximum angle of deflection. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper exploration of the dynamics involved in these collision scenarios.
neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
683
TL;DR Summary
Trying to understand physics of maximum deflection
When a heavier mass (or nucleus say) collides with a lighter one, it deflects through a certain angle which has a theoretical maximum. There are numerous derivations for this maximum angle of deflection ##(\sin\theta_{d_{max}}=m/M)## where m is the small mass and M the larger but none seem to provide a clear physical explanation of what is going on. I tried to understand it in terms of energy transfer but got nowhere with that. So my question is what is physically going on when we reach maximum angle of deflection ? Is there something that physically defines when we move from a 'grazing' collision to a 'non grazing' collision ? Here for example is a plot of ##\tan\theta_d## vs ##\theta_i## where the latter angle of incidence is measured from the plane of contact. The mass ratio m/M in this case is 0.6 and so ##\theta_{d_{max}}=36.87^{\circ}## when ##\theta_i=63.42^{\circ}.##

1635184873136.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Below is a diagram that shows why the angle that the incoming body is scattered is always limited when its mass is greater than the target body's mass. The momenta of the two bodies are equal and opposite in the center of mass system but the velocities are not. The incoming mass dominates the velocity of the center of mass. Since the momentum of the incoming body in the center of mass system cannot be greater than 90° going to the lab system the center of mass velocity further increases its velocity reducing the scattering angle.

max scatt angle is limited..png
 
Thanks. I more or less understand why the angle of deflection is limited but I am trying to understand the exact physical conditions which are met when we reach the maximum angle.
 
neilparker62 said:
Thanks. I more or less understand why the angle of deflection is limited but I am trying to understand the exact physical conditions which are met when we reach the maximum angle.
Are you looking for some kind of rule like "when a projectile reaches maximum height its gravitational potential energy is maximum"?
 
Yes. Perhaps I'm missing something really obvious ?!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top