- #1
Mederman
- 4
- 3
Hello!
My kid asks if this is theoretical idea is correct and I just don't know this stuff very well:
It is impossible to travel at light speed but not impossible to travel just below. So the highest theoretical speed should be:
"The distance light has traveled in one second" minus "One Planck length"
I ask: How about "The distance light has traveled in on hour" minus "One Planck length", isn't that closer to the speed of light?
He didn't like that because he think that a Planck length is the smallest thing and cannot be divided. How should we think about this?
My kid asks if this is theoretical idea is correct and I just don't know this stuff very well:
It is impossible to travel at light speed but not impossible to travel just below. So the highest theoretical speed should be:
"The distance light has traveled in one second" minus "One Planck length"
I ask: How about "The distance light has traveled in on hour" minus "One Planck length", isn't that closer to the speed of light?
He didn't like that because he think that a Planck length is the smallest thing and cannot be divided. How should we think about this?