Maximum Voltage Between Long Coaxial Cylinders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the maximum voltage between long coaxial cylinders using equations related to capacitance and electric fields. It begins with the capacitance formula for a cylindrical capacitor and transitions to analyzing the electric field between the plates, emphasizing that the parallel plate model is not applicable. Gauss' law is suggested for determining how the electric field varies, with the conclusion that the electric field is maximized when the radius is minimized. The final equations show the relationship between maximum charge, electric field, and voltage, leading to a clear expression for maximum voltage. The analysis concludes that the derived expressions are satisfactory for understanding the system's behavior.
cwill53
Messages
220
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Derive an expression for the maximum voltage allowable between long coaxial cylinders of radii ##R_1##, ##R_2## (##R_2> R_1##), if the field strength in the insulation between them is not to exceed ##E_m##.

Answer: ##E_mR_1ln\frac{R_2}{R_1}##
Relevant Equations
##C=\frac{Q}{V}##
##E=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}##
At first, I started with the result from an earlier problem regarding the capacitance of a cylindrical capacitor:

$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{2\pi \varepsilon _0\varepsilon _rl}{ln(R_1/R_2)}$$
$$\Rightarrow V=\frac{Qln(R_2/R_1)}{2\pi \varepsilon _0\varepsilon _rl }$$

Then I used the equation involving the electric field between the plates of a parallel capacitor filled with a dielectric material:
$$E_m=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}$$
$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q}{Q-q}\frac{\varepsilon _0}{d}$$
$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q}{Q-q}\frac{\varepsilon _0}{d}$$
where d would be the distance between the parallel plate capacitor's plates, but I'll take to be ##R_2-R_1## for the cylindrical plates.
$$\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q\varepsilon _0S}{(Q-q)d}\Rightarrow V=\frac{Q(Q-q)d}{Q\varepsilon _0S}=E_md$$
I'm not sure where to proceed from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwill53 said:
Then I used the equation involving the electric field between the plates of a parallel capacitor filled with a dielectric material:
$$E_m=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}$$
You cannot assume that the parallel plate expression for E is applicable to the cylindrical plates. I assume that ##S## is the surface area of one of the plates and ##q## is the induced charge on the surface of the dielectric. Note that the plates of the cylindrical capacitor do not have the same area.

The electric field is not uniform between the plates of a cylindrical capacitor. You can use Gauss' law to find how the field varies between the plates. Then you can see where the field is a maximum. You might want to start with the case of no dielectric material between the plates. Adding the dielectric just changes the field in a simple manner.
 
  • Like
Likes cwill53
TSny said:
You cannot assume that the parallel plate expression for E is applicable to the cylindrical plates. I assume that ##S## is the surface area of one of the plates and ##q## is the induced charge on the surface of the dielectric. Note that the plates of the cylindrical capacitor do not have the same area.

The electric field is not uniform between the plates of a cylindrical capacitor. You can use Gauss' law to find how the field varies between the plates. Then you can see where the field is a maximum. You might want to start with the case of no dielectric material between the plates. Adding the dielectric just changes the field in a simple manner.
I decuded from this that E is maximum when R is minimum.
$$\Phi =EA=E2\pi Rl=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon}\Rightarrow E=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon Rl};\varepsilon =\varepsilon _r\varepsilon _0$$
$$V=\int -EdR=-\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}\int_{R_2}^{R_1}\frac{dR}{R}=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}\int_{R_1}^{R_2}\frac{1}{R}dR$$
From this,
$$V=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
The minimum that R can be is ##R_1##, and this sets the maximum corresponding charge ##Q_m##.
$$E_m=\frac{Q_m}{2\pi \varepsilon R_1l}\Rightarrow Q_m=E_m2\pi \varepsilon R_1l$$
$$V_m=\frac{Q_m}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )=\frac{E_m2\pi \varepsilon R_1l}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
$$\Rightarrow V_m=E_mR_1ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Looks very good 😊
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi and cwill53
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top